Unit vector in polar coorindate

athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
In rectangular corr. 3i+j mean leght in x-direction =3 in y-3direction =1

However, how about in polar coorindate?
3r+1\theta (r and \theta are the unit verctor in polar coor., I don't know how to type it out, I hope you understand.)

Dose it mean a line with length 3 from origin and angle 1 radian from x-axis?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
athrun200 said:
In rectangular corr. 3i+j mean leght in x-direction =3 in y-3direction =1

However, how about in polar coorindate?
3r+1\theta (r and \theta are the unit verctor in polar coor., I don't know how to type it out, I hope you understand.)

Dose it mean a line with length 3 from origin and angle 1 radian from x-axis?
Yes, just as 3i+j means three "steps" in the x-direction and 1 "step" in the y-direction, 3r + 1\theta means three "steps" away from the origin and 1 "step" counter-clockwise from the x-axis.
 
Hootenanny said:
Yes, just as 3i+j means three "steps" in the x-direction and 1 "step" in the y-direction, 3r + 1\theta means three "steps" away from the origin and 1 "step" counter-clockwise from the x-axis.

How to convert the vector in retangular corrdinate to polar coordinate?
For example, 3i+j, how to write in polar corrdinate unit vector?
 
For a detailed explanation see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_coordinate_system

In polar coordinates, the radius is simply the distance from the origin (i.e. the magnitude of your position vector). So in your example, r = |3\hat{i} + \hat{j}| = \sqrt{10}. The angular component is simply the angle between your vector and the positive x-direction. Since your point is in the first quadrant, this is simply \theta=\arctan(y/x) = \arctan(1/3). If your point were to be in a different quadrant, you would have to adjust accordingly.
 
I am still very unfamiliar with this new topic, and I still have a lot of question marks in my head.

The details of my reply please refer to my attachment
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 438
athrun200 said:
I am still very unfamiliar with this new topic, and I still have a lot of question marks in my head.

The details of my reply please refer to my attachment
The unit vector \vex{e}_\theta represents an "additional" rotation from the vector \vec{e}_r. Notice that the unit vector \vec{e}_r is the direction from the origin to the point in space \vec{r}: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Polar_unit_vectors.PNG.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top