Units being used in the graphs for ψ and radius (in nm) and ψ^2 and ra

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the understanding of the wavefunction (ψ) in quantum mechanics, particularly its units and interpretation. The units of ψ are identified as nm^(-3/2), while the squared wavefunction (ψ^2) has units of 1/nm^3. This squared value is crucial as it represents the probability density of finding a particle in a specific region of space, with peaks indicating areas of higher likelihood. The conversation highlights the complexity of interpreting wavefunctions, emphasizing that they cannot be understood in isolation but rather through their probabilistic implications. The concept of "electron clouds" is introduced, illustrating the non-deterministic nature of particle locations in quantum mechanics. The discussion acknowledges the varying interpretations of quantum mechanics, suggesting that in some frameworks, the wavefunction is considered a tangible entity.
tennispro1213
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1401983571.568740.jpg


We've just started learning about ψ in the quantum mechanics section of our atomic structure chapter. So while reading, I found these graphs where they used certain units along the y-axis for the graphs for ψ and radius (in nm), and ψ^2 and radius.

What units are these exactly?

My chemistry teacher wasn't able to give a reasonable explanation, and trying to learn about it online has left me overwhelmed with all sorts of complicated formulae.
So please help, and don't forget: this is the first time I'm reading about all this.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The units of ψ are probably $$nm^{-\frac{3}{2}}$$
If you square it and integrate it over the 3D volume, the result has to be dimensionless (1, if properly normalized). So the unit of ψ2 is just ##\frac{1}{nm^3}##.
 
My limited understanding of wavefunctions is that you cannot physically interpret a wavefunction in and of itself. The square of a wavefunction is interpreted in a probabilistic manner such that the square of the absolute value of psi can be interpreted as the probability of finding the particle in a region (x + dx). You can read a bit more about it here. You can see in your attachments that the psi2 gives some peaks which are areas where you are most likely to find the particle. Additionally you have many areas where the probability of finding the particle is non-zero, so you can find the particle in those regions some of the time but less often. This is the reason why you may have been hearing about "electron clouds" and such and the spooky nature of the quantum world. I'm sure others may have better answers for you.
 
Yanick said:
My limited understanding of wavefunctions is that you cannot physically interpret a wavefunction in and of itself.
You can.
Interpretations of quantum mechanics
In some of them, the wavefunction is a real thing.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top