Units of Measurement for Railcar Operating Loads

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how to appropriately title a column for railcar operating loads that includes various units of measurement like kN, MN, and N/mm2. Suggestions for the column title include simply "Units" or "Measurement Units." The consensus leans towards "Units" as the most straightforward option. Participants express humor about the potential for excessive wording in the title. Clear and concise terminology is emphasized for effective communication.
Altai
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody!
Would someone please advise on the following matter.
I'm making up a table of railcar operating loads. One of the column includes abbreviated units of measurement such as kN, MN, N/mm2, etc. The question is: How should I title the column? I was thinking about titling it "Measurement", but I'm not 100% sure if it's OK since I am no native English speaker. What is the most typical heading for such a column?
Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Altai! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Altai said:
One of the column includes abbreviated units of measurement such as kN, MN, N/mm2, etc. The question is: How should I title the column?

"Units" :smile:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi Altai! Welcome to PF! :wink:

Thank you tiny-tim! :)

tiny-tim said:
"Units" :smile:

Just "units" is OK? What about "measurement units"? Or will it be excessive?
 
Monstrously excessive! :biggrin:

(After all, what other sort of units could they be? :rolleyes: Accommodation units? :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
Monstrously excessive! :biggrin:

(After all, what other sort of units could they be? :rolleyes: Accommodation units? :wink:)

:smile:
Thank you tiny-tim, that really was an eye-opener!
:smile:
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top