Units of Solid Angle: SI, Metric & Imperial Systems

AI Thread Summary
The solid angle is dimensionless but is assigned the SI unit of steradian for clarity. While it technically has no alternative units, other systems use terms like "square degree" and "fractional area" to describe solid angles. These terms help convey the concept of how much area a solid angle subtends on a sphere. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding these distinctions in different measurement systems. Overall, solid angles are primarily measured in steradians, with other units serving as supplementary descriptors.
manjuvenamma
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What are the units of solid angle in other systems ( In SI, it is steradian)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solid angle is technically dimensionless, i.e. it has no real units. It is simply 'assigned' the SI unit of 'steradian' to distinguish it from other dimensionless quantities, such as constants etc.

Therefore, the solid angle has no alternative units other than SI.
 
The first thing I did was use good old "Google" which sent me to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_angle
where I learned that the corresponding units are "square degree" and "fractional area" (what fraction of a circle does it subtend?).

I agree with Hootenanny that a solid angle (like any angle) is dimensionless but it appears there are other "assigned" units.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The first thing I did was use good old "Google" which sent me to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_angle
where I learned that the corresponding units are "square degree" and "fractional area" (what fraction of a circle does it subtend?).
I wasn't aware that there were other 'assigned' units for the Solid Angle, I guess I should google more often! Thanks Halls!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top