Universal Regeneration: Is Expansion Recycled?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alexkerhead
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether the universe expands in the same physical location after a collapse or if it exists in empty space. Participants clarify that the universe is not typically considered to be embedded in a higher-dimensional space, with the surrounding empty space being part of it. The concept of "empty space" is debated, particularly in relation to quantum field theory, which suggests that the vacuum is a significant entity. It is argued that the universe can be finite without requiring a boundary, using the analogy of a sphere's surface. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of understanding the universe's structure and expansion.
alexkerhead
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Is it possible that maybe the universe always expands in the same phsical place every time it expands, after collapse?
Or is the only viable theory that the universe floats through empty space?
I know this is a dumb question, but please, any insight is useful.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
alexkerhead said:
Is it possible that maybe the universe always expands in the same phsical place every time it expands, after collapse?
Or is the only viable theory that the universe floats through empty space?
I know this is a dumb question, but please, any insight is useful.

The universe just is, we don't usually embed it in a higher dimensional space. The empty space around us is part of the universe.
 
SpaceTiger said:
The universe just is, we don't usually embed it in a higher dimensional space. The empty space around us is part of the universe.

Do you mean with empty space a free space that can be occupied or do you mean: empty space = nothing ?
tks
 
Pippo said:
Do you mean with empty space a free space that can be occupied or do you mean: empty space = nothing ?

I mean the vacuum, which, in QFT, is most certainly something.
 
SpaceTiger said:
I mean the vacuum, which, in QFT, is most certainly something.
As the universe is not infinite what is there after the "something"?
 
There doesn't need to be anything else out there - not even some "emptiness" - for the universe to be finite. It doesn't need a boundary. Consider the surface of a sphere: it has no boundaries, yet is finite.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top