Unknown Charge Ratio Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlwood13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the ratio of two unknown point charges, Q1 and Q2, given that the electric field is zero at a point one-third of the way from Q1 to Q2. To solve this, the sum of the electric fields from both charges at that point must equal zero, indicating they are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. The relevant equation for electric fields is E = kQ/r^2, where the distances from the charges to the point are r1 = L/3 and r2 = 2L/3. By setting the electric fields equal, the ratio Q1/Q2 can be derived. The solution confirms that the charges are proportional based on their distances from the point where the electric field is zero.
jlwood13
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You are given two unknown point charges, Q_1 and Q_2 . At a point on the line joining them, one-third of the way from Q_1 to Q_2 , the electric field is zero (see figure). The charges are separated by length, L.

What is the ratio of the charges Q1/Q2?

Homework Equations



F=k(Q1Q2)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to put one charge in terms of the other, but I got lost and it seemed to be going nowhere. I'm stuck..
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI.ch21.p41.jpg
    GIANCOLI.ch21.p41.jpg
    3.5 KB · Views: 1,097
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
We cannot see the figure pending approval. What is the question? Do you know the separation between the charges?

In any case, you will need to say that the sum of the electric fields generated by the two charges at the given point is zero. Remember that electric fields are vectors, so what must be true for these two vectors to add up to zero?
 
I apologize. I added the relevant question.. If they add up to zero, they must be opposite in direction and proportional, correct?
 
I figured it out. Using E=kQ/r^2, set kQ1/(r1)^2=kQ2/(r2)^2 and solve for Q1/Q2. r1=l/3, r2=2l/3. Thanks for your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top