Unknown X in Rectangle - Mystery Image

  • Thread starter Thread starter meshac A
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rectangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing a parabola depicted in a mystery image, with a depth of 3m and an arc length of 6m. Participants suggest using equations related to arc length and depth to find the variable x. The assumption that the shape is a parabola leads to the equation y = cx², with points (b, 3) and (-b, 3) identified on the curve. The arc length is calculated using an integral that equates to the known length, resulting in two equations involving the unknowns b and c. This mathematical approach aims to solve for the parameters defining the parabola.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I haven't studied parabolas but that's a parabola with a depth of 3m and arc length of 6m.So maybe you can then find the apparent length.Then you can find x.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
i've been on it for a while now,.i'll like to see your attempt
 
meshac A said:
i've been on it for a while now,.i'll like to see your attempt
I don't know anything about parabolas yet.Maybe you can use some equation relating arc length,depth and apparent lenght
 
meshac A said:
I'm assuming that what you drew is a parabola. Is that a reasonable assumption?

If so, the equation of your parabola is y = cx2, assuming that the vertex is at (0, 0). From the drawing, the points (b, 3) and (-b, 3) are on the parabola.

The arc length shown in the drawing is the length along the curve between (-b, 3) and (b, 3). Due to symmetry, we can work with half this length, or 3 units.

Since y = cx2, then y' = 2cx, which I will use in the formula for arc length. Also, since (b, 3) is a point on the curve, then 3 = c*b2.

This equation equates the arc length integral with the known length:
$$ \int_0^b \sqrt{1 + (2cx)^2}dx = 3$$

This gives you two equations in the unknowns b and c, so it should be possible to determine b and c.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top