Unleashing the Potential of Gravitational Generator: A Theoretical Approach

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a theoretical concept for a gravitational generator involving drilling a hole through the Earth, wrapping it in a superconducting coil, and using a magnet to generate energy. It is suggested that the magnet will slow down as it moves through the coil, supported by examples of magnets dropped in copper tubes. However, the idea is critiqued for being a one-time energy source, as the magnet's oscillation will diminish over time, leading to a net energy loss. The energy required to create the hole and the infrastructure outweighs the energy harvested from the falling magnet. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, it presents significant practical challenges and inefficiencies.
CthlhuLies
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Ok this one is purely theoretical and I'm going to just make some assumptions.
1. No Debris will block the way.
2. Its A vacuum
3.The structure won't collapse.

Ok, first we drill a hole through one side the Earth and out the other. We then wrap the new whole in a superconducting coil of wire. At both ends of the wire attach a battery to collect the energy. Then drop the magnet.
http://puu.sh/741Pp.png

Would the magnet be slowed?
I came up with this today and only researched a little on how magnetic generators generally work.
Squares are magnets. The brown lines are the wires previously mentioned.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the magnet will be slowed. There are videos of people dropping magnets down copper tubes on youtube that should show this.
 
Drakkith said:
Yes, the magnet will be slowed. There are videos of people dropping magnets down copper tubes on youtube that should show this.

Thanks for the reply I had this idea milling around in my mind all day. :D
 
This is only a one shot device, remember. The magnet will oscillate along the polar axis but the displacement will gradually die down as energy is used up. It is a very expensive way to harvest the PE of a falling object. Remember, you had to dig out all that material to make the hole in the first place. That would involve much more energy than you will get out.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top