How Do You Solve 4^x = 8x Algebraically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 4^x = 8x presents challenges for algebraic solutions due to its transcendental nature. While taking the natural logarithm was attempted, it did not yield helpful results. The equation has two real solutions, which can be determined graphically. Additionally, the solutions can be expressed using the Lambert W function. Understanding these methods is essential for solving such equations effectively.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
Wow, I can't believe I couldn't do this.

4^x=8x

I tried taking the natural logarithm of both sides, but that didn't help very much. I can see that an answer is 2, but I want to know how to get to that algebraicly.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
who says you can do it algebraically?
 
It has 2 real solutions which can be found graphically.The equation is transcendental.

The solutions are expressible in terms of the Lambert function

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
Alright well thanks for your help.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top