Unparticle Physics and Higgs Sector

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tack
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Physics
Tack
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi!

That's my first thread and I apologize for my bad English, but there's a question in my mind that makes me crazy...

At the moment I'm working on Unparticle Physics especially on the coupling between the SM Higgs sector and the unparticle sector.

There is a paper by Fox, Rajaraman and Shirman called "Bounds on Unparticles from the Higgs Sector" (arXiv:0705.3092), where they say that once the Higgs acquires a vev, the Higgs Operator introduces a scale into the Conformal Theory and the theory will become non-conformal at a certain scale.

That kind of makes sense to me, but I can't figure out a strikt mathematically statement for that phenomenon.
Maybe someone can help me out with a Idea, how to show this breaking of scale invariance exactly.

I thank you!

Tack
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mmm, what are you looking for exactly?

You have a coupling HHO that relates the standard model to the unparticle sector via the Higgs, that we are interested in studying in the infrared. Once you turn on a vev, you introduce a mass scale into the theory and will deform the conformal diagram by exactly the contributions of this 'relevant' operator (in principle there could be many operators that also break conformal invariance, but here they are studying a simple toy model where O is unique).

So are you asking about the renormalization group aspects (eg why you flow away from the fixed point in this case) or why a scale is introduced when you turn on the vacuum expectation value? Or maybe you want to show something more explicitly, like noninvariance under scale transformations?

Either way the necessary (but probably not sufficient) material can be found in a textbook on conformal field theory, like Di Francesco. But as far as I can see, the answer is more or less manifest.
 
Ok, what I'm looking for is, why I introduce a mass scale when I turn on a vev.

Haelfix said:
So are you asking about the renormalization group aspects (eg why you flow away from the fixed point in this case)

Isn't that the same? I thought, when I introduce a mass scale, the coupling gets energy dependent and it flows away from the fixed point...

Hmmm... I think tomorrow I will look for a textbook...

Thanks a lot!
 
"Ok, what I'm looking for is, why I introduce a mass scale when I turn on a vev."

The Higgs mechanism gets turned on, and you will now have mass term(s) present. This mechanism spontaneously breaks the conformal symmetry and the rest follows.

"Isn't that the same? I thought, when I introduce a mass scale, the coupling gets energy dependent and it flows away from the fixed point..."

Correct!
 
Thank you!

Haelfix said:
The Higgs mechanism gets turned on, and you will now have mass term(s) present.

Ok, I understand what happens, when I turn on the vev, but not exactly why. When I have a SM Lagrangian I know what happens. I introduce a Higgs potential, decompose it and see immediately the mass dependence. But now, I have this operator coupling HHO and I don't know how to show the mass dependence mathematically. My problem is to handle these Operators mathematically... :confused:

Demystifier said:
This paper
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0707.0893
may (or may not) be relevant.

Thanks, but I've read all these Unparticle/Higgs papers and they all just say, "when the Higgsfield gets a vev, the conformal symmetry is broken"...
 
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
Many of us have heard of "twistors", arguably Roger Penrose's biggest contribution to theoretical physics. Twistor space is a space which maps nonlocally onto physical space-time; in particular, lightlike structures in space-time, like null lines and light cones, become much more "local" in twistor space. For various reasons, Penrose thought that twistor space was possibly a more fundamental arena for theoretical physics than space-time, and for many years he and a hardy band of mostly...
Back
Top