Unraveling the Mystery of 4π in Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the presence of the 4π factor in Coulomb's Law within the SI unit system, contrasting it with the CGS system where the factor is handled differently. The 4π arises from the spherical geometry of the electric field generated by a point charge, as it relates to the distribution of energy across spherical surfaces. This factor is essential for maintaining the consistency of electromagnetic equations, particularly in the context of Gauss's Law and the propagation of spherical waves. While both SI and CGS systems incorporate the 4π, they do so in different mathematical contexts without altering the underlying physics. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping the relationships between electromagnetic quantities and their equations.
Rats_N_Cats
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Why the 4π in Coulomb's Law, SI version? The CGS version does well without it...:confused:

<br /> \mbox{thanks in advance!}<br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pythagorean said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statcoulomb

They're not dimensionally equivalent. The 4pi is a result of the spherical geometry of the field created by a point charge.

I've read that link you provided...I understand the difference between statcoulomb and coulomb, that they're not dimensionally equivalent. however this comes from the εo, which has a dimension. It doesn't say why the 4π enters the picture
 
Last edited:
And what's the "spherical geometry of the field created by a point charge"? Could anyone elaborate on that?
 
So both CGS and SI have the 4π, only in different places? But what is its necessity? Wouldn't it be possible to define the electromagnetic units such that the factor of 4π is eliminated?
 
It is necessary because of the spherical geometry inherent in the physics. For example, if I have a point source antenna that creates spherical waves, the energy across any spherical surface centered about our source must remain constant in a lossless medium. That is, if we have a lossless medium, then the energy emitted must remain constant. If we emit spherical waves, then the entire energy spread across a given wavefront remains constat as it propagates out in space. If we were to look at the energy at a single point on the wavefront as the wave expanded/propagated, then we would see that the fields would drop off as 1/(4 \pi r^2) since the surface of the wavefront is expanding as a spherical surface.

This is where we get the 4\pi from. In terms of statics, we can look at Gauss' Law. If I place a single point charge at the center of a spherical Gaussian surface, then the total flux through the Gaussian surface of the electric field is proportional to the charge. Through the use of spherical symmetry we can actually derive the actual electric field from this relationship. The result is of course Coulomb's law and once again due to the spherical geometry we acquire the 4\pi factor. But since Coulomb's law is incorporated into Maxwell's Equations, we can move the 4\pi off of Coulomb's law to Gauss' law and not change the resulting physics.
 
To see how the unit systems of electromagnetic quantities are constructed and understand the relations between its equations I recommend:
Jackson, J.D. Appendix on Units and Dimensions on Classical Electrodynamics.
 
<br /> \mbox{hmmm...got that}<br />
Thanks, born2bwire! :smile: Your explanation was good.
 
Back
Top