Unraveling the Mystery of Planetary Motion: Mercury & Pluto

AI Thread Summary
Mercury moves with high velocity due to its proximity to the Sun and the strong gravitational pull it experiences, which keeps it in a stable elliptical orbit. In contrast, Pluto's greater distance from the Sun results in a weaker gravitational influence, allowing it to move more slowly without being pulled into the Sun. If Pluto were to move as quickly as Mercury, it would escape the solar system instead of maintaining an orbit. The discussion highlights the relationship between gravitational force, distance, and orbital velocity, illustrating how these factors determine the motion of celestial bodies. Understanding Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion is essential to grasp the dynamics of these planetary movements.
physicallove
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
why does mercury move with such velocity while pluto is much slower?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Study Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion, then it will make sense.
 
thank you!
 
If Pluto had as much velocity as Mercury does, it would be moving too fast for Sun's relatively weak gravity to bend its orbit into an ellipse; the fast-moving Pluto would just sail on by the solar system.

If Mercury moved as slowly as Pluto does, it would be moving too slow to stay in its elliptical orbit under the Sun's very strong pull, and would fall into the sun.

Indeed, (highly simplified) in the early years of the solar system, there would have been many bodies with many different velocities just like that. They flew off or collided with each other fell into the sun until the only ones left were the few we see that found stable orbits and stopped crashing into each other.
 
The centripetal acceleration is:
<br /> a = \frac{v^{2}}{r}<br />

If this acceleration is provided by a gravitational force $F(r)$ from the Sun, that somehow varies with distance, then:
<br /> F(r) = m a<br />


From here. by knowing how the force varies with distance, we can find how the velocity varies with distance:
<br /> v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{r F(r)}{m}}<br />
The velocity will not depend on distance iff:
<br /> F(r) = O(\frac{1}{r})<br />
If the gravitational force falls off with distance faster than this, then the orbital velocity of more distant bodies should decrease. On the other hand, if it falls off more slowly, then it will increase.
 
Dickfore said:
The centripetal acceleration is:
<br /> a = \frac{v^{2}}{r}<br />

If this acceleration is provided by a gravitational force $F(r)$ from the Sun, that somehow varies with distance, then:
<br /> F(r) = m a<br />


From here. by knowing how the force varies with distance, we can find how the velocity varies with distance:
<br /> v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{r F(r)}{m}}<br />
The velocity will not depend on distance iff:
<br /> F(r) = O(\frac{1}{r})<br />
If the gravitational force falls off with distance faster than this, then the orbital velocity of more distant bodies should decrease. On the other hand, if it falls off more slowly, then it will increase.

Judging by the question being asked, do you think this answer will be useful (comprehensible) to the OP? :rolleyes:
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top