Unraveling the Mystery: The Quest to Understand Magnetic Monopoles

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the existence of magnetic monopoles, exploring theoretical implications, experimental evidence, and philosophical considerations. Participants examine the nature of magnetic charge in relation to established physical laws and concepts in electromagnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Philosophical inquiry

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why magnetic monopoles do not exist, suggesting that their existence remains an open question.
  • Others propose that if magnetic monopoles do exist, their magnetic charge would likely be much smaller than electric charge, due to the precision of Maxwell's equations.
  • A participant introduces the concept of duality transformation in Maxwell's equations, suggesting that electric and magnetic charges can be interrelated, and raises the importance of the ratio of magnetic to electric charge/current.
  • One participant argues that the question of "why" magnetic monopoles do not exist is philosophical and cautions against asking such questions in science, implying that some inquiries may not lead to fruitful scientific exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of magnetic monopoles, with some asserting that it remains an unresolved question while others explore theoretical frameworks that could accommodate their existence. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the duality transformation and its implications for understanding electric and magnetic charges, but the discussion does not resolve the mathematical or conceptual complexities involved.

NEILS BOHR
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
magnetic monopoles??

why don't magnetic monopoles exist??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Actually the question can be set in a different way? Do the magnetic monopoles exist?
The last question still do not have answer. The magnetic monoples may or may not exist. If they exist then the magnetic charge should be much, much less then a electric charge due to the fact that the Maxwell equations are tested to high precision and therefore only a very small magnetic charge can exist.
From time to time there are publications that claimed the demonstration of the Dirac monopoles (such as spin ice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_ice) but the real monopoles are not found in Nature yet…..
 


The question is even actually slightly more interesting then that. There is what is called a duality transformation for Maxwells equations which can transform E and B into E' and B', and electric charge and current into a mixture of electric charge, current, and also magnetic charges and currents. That is, for example, an electron would be partially an electric monopole and partially a magnetic monopole in the new fields instead of pure electric monopole. It would also then be partially magnetic dipole and electric dipole instead of pure magnetic dipole. So what is important is if the *ratio* of magnetic charge/current to electric charge/current is the same everywhere. If so, then one can conveniently transform away one or the other. Historically, the fields are chosen such that magnetic charge/current = zero.

Duality transformation from Jackson p. 274
\vec{E} = \vec{E}'cos(\theta) + Z_0\vec{H}'sin(\theta)
Z_0\vec{H} = -\vec{E}'sin(\theta) + Z_0\vec{H}'cos(\theta)

Z_0\vec{D} = Z_0\vec{D}'cos(\theta) + \vec{B}'sin(\theta)
\vec{B} = -Z_0\vec{D}'sin(\theta) + \vec{B}'cos(\theta)

Z_0\rho_e = Z_0\rho_e'cos(\theta) + \rho_m'sin(\theta)
\rho_m = -Z_0\rho_e'sin(\theta) + \rho_m'cos(\theta)

Z_0\vec{J_e} = Z_0\vec{J_e}'cos(\theta) + \vec{J_m}'sin(\theta)
\vec{J_m} = -Z_0\vec{J_e}'sin(\theta) + \vec{J_m}'cos(\theta)

Z_0 = \sqrt{\mu_0/\epsilon_0}

Subscripts e or m indicate electric and magnetic sources respectively.

It can be fun to play around with these to come up with different configurations.
 
Last edited:


your question is more philosophical in nature...in science there is a caution in handling a question of "why"...you can't ask "why" questions always...
well y arent they any monopoles.? - god noes !... its like asking y do Newton's laws wroks? or ts like y is force equals m times acceleration... well its good that you started 'thinking' the science way, but do think upon why your question of "why" dosent survive . ah ! dats a pun der ! ;)... check out this on my blog if u have time http://intellectual-discomfort.blogspot.com/2011/01/science-is-questioning-but-wait-what-to.html
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K