Unraveling the Physics of Frost on a Car Sunroof

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of frost formation on a car's sunroof, particularly the linear patterns observed. The linear formation, with feathery offshoots, raises questions about why frost does not form radially like snowflakes and how lines can intersect without interaction. It is suggested that pre-existing scratches or imperfections on the glass surface significantly influence the frost's structure, as these features can guide crystal growth. The presence of microscopic dust particles and the complex process of crystal nucleation also play roles in this phenomenon. Dendritic crystals form under specific energy conditions, where the surface energy is lower in scratched areas, allowing crystals to preferentially grow along these grooves. This understanding highlights the interplay between surface characteristics and the thermodynamics of crystal formation.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,839
Reaction score
7,835
What is the physics behind this kind of frost, seen on the sunroof on my car?

Why does it form so linearly, even though every line has feathery offhsoots? (Why don't they all form radially, more like snowflakes?)

Why are lines able to cross each other with apparently no interaction?

I could see if these lines were being formed from pre-existing scratches in the windshield - that would explain both the above questions, since it would mean the structure of the lines has much more to do with the surfacfe and much less to do with the formation of crystals. But wouldn't the scratches have a more regular pattern, such as in line with the car's motion?
 

Attachments

  • PF080309frost.jpg
    PF080309frost.jpg
    47.4 KB · Views: 525
Chemistry news on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
What is the physics behind this kind of frost, seen on the sunroof on my car?

Why does it form so linearly, even though every line has feathery offhsoots? (Why don't they all form radially, more like snowflakes?)

Why are lines able to cross each other with apparently no interaction?

I could see if these lines were being formed from pre-existing scratches in the windshield - that would explain both the above questions, since it would mean the structure of the lines has much more to do with the surfacfe and much less to do with the formation of crystals. But wouldn't the scratches have a more regular pattern, such as in line with the car's motion?

It would depend on scratches only, if the windscreen were perfectly clean; the process of crystals nucleation is complex, it could also be due to the presence of microscopic dust particles or glass imperfections but also on pre-existing (before using the car) microscopic scratches.
 
Last edited:
Dedritic crystals (like snowflakes) form when the energy balance between new surface area and phase change is negative, IIRC. That is, when it's energetically favorable to create new surface area (because the interfacial energy is low), a nucleating crystal will form a dendritic hanbit. There was a good experiment called "Isothermal Dendritic Growth Experiment (IDGE)" done on the space shuttle. A good discussion of the physics is here:

http://www.rpi.edu/locker/56/000756/

Now, on a scratched surface, the surface energy will be lower in some places than others (due to the scratch), and so a crystal will preferentially follow the groove.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top