Unravelling the Separation of 35CI19F Atoms: A Problem Solved

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmarson123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Separation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the equilibrium separation of atoms in the diatomic molecule 35Cl19F based on its rotational spectrum, specifically the frequency separation of adjacent lines.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between photon energy, frequency, and moment of inertia. There are attempts to connect the frequency of the spectrum to the equilibrium separation using various equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing calculations and questioning assumptions about mass and units. Some have provided calculations for the equilibrium separation, while others are clarifying the correct use of constants and units.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the conversion of molar masses to appropriate units for calculations, and participants are discussing how to correctly apply these values in the context of the problem.

bmarson123
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Problem:
The adjacent lines in the pure rotational spectrum of 35CI19F are separated by a frequency of
1.12 x 1010 Hz. What is the equilibrium separation of the atoms in this molecule?

The attempt at a solution

So, the equation I think I need to use to find the equilibrium separation is I = \mur02
But I don't know how I can find the inertia,as I don't know how the frequency and inertia are linked?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


The emitted or absorbed photon energies differ by ΔE=[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]2/I. How is the photon energy related to frequency?

I is the moment of inertia of the diatomic molecule: I=r2m1m2/(m1+m2), where r is the distance between the atoms.

ehild
 


Thank you!

Ok, so I've tried using \DeltaE = [STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/I

and to find \DeltaE, \DeltaE = hf

and then just number crunching that all through, using m1 = 35 and m2 = 19,

I get r = 1.1 x 10-6m

Is that right? It seems pretty big?
 


Yes, does help if I look at my notes properly.

Working that through I get r = 1.1 x 10-23m
 


Can you show your calculations in detail?

ehild
 


[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE] = h / 2\pi = 1.055 x10-34 Js

\DeltaE = hf = h x 1.12 x1010 = 7.4256 x10-24

I = [STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]2/\DeltaE
= 1.113 x10-68 / 7.4256 x10-24
= 1.520 x 10-45

r = \sqrt{1.520x10<sup>-45</sup>/12.314}
= 1.1 x10-23m
 


What is the reduced mass? Did you take it 12.34 kg? Is the mass of a molecule in the range of kg-s?
 


That's what I've taken it as, yes. I realize now how stupid that is but I don't know how to work out the mass from the numbers. I don't even know what the numbers are next to the elements.
 
  • #10


Those numbers are the "molar" masses, the mass of one mole of atoms in gram unit. How many atoms are there in one mole?

ehild
 
  • #11


6.02 x 1023?

Do I need to divide the value of \mu by that?
 
  • #12


bmarson123 said:
6.02 x 1023?

Do I need to divide the value of \mu by that?

Yes.

ehild
 
  • #13


Is the right answer 8.62 x 10-12m?
 
  • #14


Not yet. 12.34 is the molar mass in grams, so divided by the Avogadro number, you get μ in grams, but you need it in kg-s in the equation.

ehild
 
  • #15


2.72 x10-10m?
 
  • #16


It is OK.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K