Unsolved Scientific Problems in Classical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Key unsolved problems in classical mechanics include the complexities of fluid dynamics and turbulence, which remain challenging for scientists, as exemplified by the difficulties in understanding bumblebee flight. The N-body problem continues to be unresolved, with only a few specific cases having solutions since its introduction by Newton. Additionally, there is a noted absence of a classical mechanics-only approach to geometric phases in chaotic systems. These issues highlight significant gaps in the understanding of rigid body mechanics, deformable-body mechanics, and fluid mechanics. Addressing these problems could advance the field of classical mechanics significantly.
Muhammad
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hallo Everyone,

What are the most important unsolved problems in Classical Mechanics especially related to mechanics of rigid body mechanics, deformable-body mechanics and, fluid mechanics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Muhammad said:
Hallo Everyone,

What are the most important unsolved problems in Classical Mechanics especially related to mechanics of rigid body mechanics, deformable-body mechanics and, fluid mechanics.

I have read that complicated fluid dynamics and turbulence is still a beast to deal with.
e.g. http://www.livescience.com/33075-how-bees-fly.html -- scientists took a while to figure out how bumble bees generate enough lift for flight.
 
For classical mechanics, the N-body problem is still unsolved, except for a few special cases. It's been around since Newton.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-body_problem
 
Not sure if important, but I think there is still missing A classical mechanics-only approach to geometric phases in chaotic systems .
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top