Unstretched Spring and Angular Velocity Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a disk attached to an unstretched spring on a frictionless table, where the goal is to determine how much the spring stretches when the disk is orbited at a specific angular velocity. The initial attempt at the solution included incorrect unit conversions, which led to confusion in calculations. After correcting the spring constant to 43000 N/m and converting the length to meters, the calculations aligned correctly. Participants emphasized the importance of using standard units for accurate results. Ultimately, proper unit conversion resolved the issue, leading to a successful solution.
BitterSuites
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Unstretched Spring and Angular Velocity Problem

Homework Statement



A disk of mass 73 kg is held by a spring of unstretched length 88 cm and stiffness constant 430 N/cm, and rests on a frictionless table. It is then orbited in a circle at angular velocity .675 rad/s.

By how much is the spring stretched? Answer in units of cm.

Homework Equations



After a bit of derivation, I came up with x = r/((k/mw^2)-1).

The Attempt at a Solution



r = 88
k = 430
m= 73
w = .675

It does not seem to work out. Am I being to complicated about it? Any help/hand-holding is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force acting on the disc in circular motion== mv^2/r

Now use hook's law to calculate extension..
 
BitterSuites said:
After a bit of derivation, I came up with x = r/((k/mw^2)-1).
Looks good to me.

The Attempt at a Solution



r = 88
k = 430
m= 73
w = .675
Make sure you are using standard units. Express lengths (and k) in terms of meters, not cm.
 
Thanks for the catch on conversion. I changed length to .88 and K to 4.3, getting an answer in m. I then converted it to cm but the online system still says I am incorrect.

I can't use mv^2/r because I don't have v. That is why I did that insane derivation.

Or am I wrong?

I think I'm a few baby steps away from having this.
 
BitterSuites said:
I changed length to .88 and K to 4.3...
Redo that last one. :wink:
 
Uh oh. Did I go the wrong way with it? 43000N/m?
 
That's better.
 
Oh, thank you so much *sighs in relief*

Converting correctly makes the problem work. Who knew? :D
 
Back
Top