UP regarding value of a field and its rate of change

Suwailem
Gold Member
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am just a hobbyist and try to learn for myself.

I understand that the value of a field and its rate of change play the same role of position and momentum of a particle with respect to Uncertainty Principle, i.e. both pairs are conjugate variables. My question is: does the rate of change of a field extends to the negative domain, so that it could take negative values, or is it always non-negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Derivative of a field can be negative and it often is negative. If it were always positive (or zero), the field value would be always and forever growing (or not changing).
 
Thank you mvp_plate.
 
If the momentum is always positive (or non-negative), then the analogy of momentum with rate of change will not be one to one?
 
Suwailem said:
If the momentum is always positive (or non-negative), then the analogy of momentum with rate of change will not be one to one?

Momentum is not always non-negative. Consider two bodies of equal mass moving in opposite directions: their momenta will be of equal magnitude but opposite sign, so the total momentum of the system is zero.
 
Nugatory said:
Momentum is not always non-negative. Consider two bodies of equal mass moving in opposite directions: their momenta will be of equal magnitude but opposite sign, so the total momentum of the system is zero.

Thank you Nugatory.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top