Upside down falling body problem

AI Thread Summary
A rocket launched at 500 feet/sec (approximately 152 m/sec) can be analyzed using gravitational acceleration of 9.81 m/s^2. Assuming no air resistance and constant gravity, the time to reach the peak height, where the velocity becomes zero, is calculated to be about 15.5 seconds. The problem can be solved by integrating the velocity equation and determining when it equals zero. Additionally, the discussion hints at extending the analysis to calculate how high the rocket ascends and the total time until it returns to the ground. The conversation emphasizes the simplicity of the calculations involved in this type of physics problem.
kmarlow123
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A rocket shoots upward with a velocity of 500 feet/sec. Neglecting air resistance, how high will it travel? Is that even enough info to solve the problem? I don't remember how to solve that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kmarlow123 said:
A rocket shoots upward with a velocity of 500 feet/sec. Neglecting air resistance, how high will it travel? Is that even enough info to solve the problem? I don't remember how to solve that.
Well, if you assume that it left the launch pad at 500 feet/sec, and there's no thrust at that point, and assume constant acceleration from gravity, it's solvable. Not a very realistic scenario, but there you are.

Forgive me for converting to metric, but I despise doing anything with the imperial system. So let's say 500 feet/sec is about 152 meters/sec. You want the point where it starts to fall to earth. At that point, the velocity should be 0.

Gravity is about g = 9.81 m/s^2 and is constant. t is time, a is acceleration, and v is velocity.

-g = a = -9.81 m/s^2

Now take the integral with respect to t. You get v = -9.81t + C. At t = 0, we know v = 152 m/s, so 152 = -9.81(t) + C. So C = 152, giving an integral of v = -9.81t + 152.

Ok, now you need to know when it will be zero. So:

0 = -9.81t + 152

Solving for t, we get t = -152 / -9.81 = 15.5

So after about 15.5 seconds, it should start to fall back to earth.

Note that you can solve this pretty easily by thinking it through, however. I thought I'd show you how to solve this class of problem in general, but it shouldn't be hard to just think "Oh, 152 m/s, and it will lose 9.81 m/s every second, so to get to 0 velocity, it takes 152 / 9.81 = 15.5".

If you understood this, you can also tell me how long before it hits the ground, right? :) In fact, you should also know how to tell me how far up it went.

On a side note, this would be much more readable if I could get tex formatting working. It keeps showing some old equation for some reason.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top