Upside Down Rocket: Thrust & Conversion to Newtons

  • Thread starter Thread starter smarthimandrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
AI Thread Summary
When a model rocket is secured upside down on a scale, the display will initially show the weight of the rocket in kilograms. After resetting the scale to zero, igniting the rocket will cause the scale to read the thrust in kilograms. To convert this thrust to Newtons, multiply the displayed value by 9.8. Model rocket motors are classified by their impulse, which is the product of force and duration, affecting the thrust output over time. Understanding these principles helps accurately measure and convert thrust values for model rockets.
smarthimandrew
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I were to take a model rocket and secure it upside down to a kg scale, what would I be reading on the scale's display? I would assume it would be the thrust of the rocket but are there other factors at play here? If it is the thrust of the rocket, how would I convert the said value to Newtons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can draw a free body diagram to analyze the forces on the rocket.

The trust vector is pointing down, as well as gravity: F + m*g.

EDIT: assuming you measure this on Earth and not in space
 
Model rocket engine thrust is published - you can just look it up. And a typical scale measures force and converts to mass by assuming you are on the surface of the Earth and applying f=ma. So it is easy enough to convert back.
 
Put rocket on scale pointing downwards.
The display will read the weight of the rocket in Kg.
Press the reset button on the scales so they read zero.
Light the rocket and the scales will read the thrust in Kg.
To convert to Newtons multiply by 9.8.

Edit:

I'm not an expert but model rocket motors are classified by the impulse they produce. The impulse is the force * duration.

So for example a Class B that is rated 5.00 N·s might produce..

5N for 1 Second
2.5N for 2 Seconds
1N for 5 Seconds
etc

They would all be Class B I believe.

I've yet to find a model shop that will sell me a 6Z class motor...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_rocket_motor_classification
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top