Why Have Uranus and Neptune Been Overlooked by Recent Space Missions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caramon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uranus
AI Thread Summary
Uranus and Neptune have not been prioritized for recent space missions, despite their scientific significance, due to budget constraints and propulsion technology limitations. The last close inspection of these planets was during the Voyager 2 mission in the 1980s, leaving many questions about their unique characteristics unanswered. Future missions are anticipated, potentially utilizing nuclear-electric propulsion, but they are projected to launch around 2020 and arrive by 2035. The ongoing focus on Jupiter and Saturn has overshadowed the need for dedicated studies of Uranus and Neptune. Addressing these gaps could enhance our understanding of gas giants and exoplanet dynamics.
Caramon
Messages
131
Reaction score
5
Not exactly sure what forum I should post this in, feel free to move it to a more appropriate forum if you wish!

Following the successful Galileo and Cassini missions to Jupiter and Saturn, respectively, and with another mission to Jupiter (Juno) coming up shortly I think it is time that the space community organized a concerted effort towards developing Uranus and Neptune Orbiters.

We have not seen any new direct information from the vicinity of the planetary systems of Uranus and Neptune and have had no further inspection of their fantastic and intriguing moons since the Voyager 2 mission in the 1980s. Considering the fact that we repeatedly send missions to Jupiter and Saturn with more planned on the horizon why are Uranus and Neptune left out of the scientific inspection? The reason why Uranus has such an extreme axial tilt and why it has a strange magnetic field coupled with Neptune's mysterious atmosphere and also seemingly misplaced magnetic field all pose interesting questions to be answered by closer inspection. Sending these orbiters would lead to a greater understanding of gas giant planets dynamics, evolution, and interactions with space.With recent advances in exoplanet research and the launch of the Kepler Space Telescope, there have been hundreds of planets discovered around the mass of Uranus and Neptune. We could develop our understanding of these fairly common exoplanets with a size of 10 to 17 Earth masses and in general have a far more in depth understanding of how planetary systems evolve and the reason for why certain planets end up being the way they are.

I'm sure these Uranus and Neptune Orbiter missions would not be of extremely excessive cost, they could likely be pulled off for around $1 billion to $1.5 billion considering what NASA's current mission costs are for unmanned orbiter programs.

It seems that Uranus and Neptune have been left in the shroud of obscurity by all NASA missions since Voyager 2 and with New Horizons on it's way to Pluto (closest approach in 2015) it seems that they have been skipped over all together.

Any thoughts or comments?

Thanks,
-Sam
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I suppose nobody gives a damn! :X

No wonder these projects don't get funding.
 
As you stated, Neptune and Uranus are unarguably invaluable to science for several reasons and the community knows it, but have been left out of probe missions due to current propulsion technology limits and budget.

There are future missions planned to be launched around 2020 and beyond, but they are depending on the development of a nuclear-electric propulsion and would be arriving around 2035. With current technology, budget limits, risk management and restraining missions to less than 15 years cruise time, it is only possible to do a fly-by, like the Voyager missions and New Horizons.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...

Similar threads

Back
Top