Use of energy or force in spring question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the force constant of a bungee cord for a jumper weighing 700N, who must stop 4m above a river. The initial calculation using Hooke's Law resulted in a force constant of 100 N/m, but this approach was deemed incorrect due to the jumper's inertia upon free fall. Instead, the energy conservation method is recommended, as it accounts for the kinetic energy of the jumper at the moment of maximum extension, which is crucial for accurate calculations in dynamic scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its application in elastic systems
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics
  • Knowledge of forces and motion, particularly in free fall scenarios
  • Familiarity with the concept of inertia and its effects on moving objects
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in elastic collisions
  • Learn how to apply Hooke's Law in dynamic situations
  • Explore the concept of potential and kinetic energy in bungee jumping scenarios
  • Investigate the effects of inertia on stopping forces in free fall
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of bungee jumping and the application of energy conservation principles in real-world scenarios.

frostchaos123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Question is:
A balloon is 36m on top of a river, a bungee jumper has a unstretched cord of 25m attached to him and his weight is 700n

If he is to stop 4m above the river what should the force constant of the cord be?

My calculation is that since the cord can only extend 7m, using hooke's law I equate 700n = -k * 7 which gives 100. However I was told that the force method is not correct and I should consider energy at start and end points instead.

So my question why is the force reasoning incorrect and if there is a general way to tell how to choose, whether by force or by energy to solve a given problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That would be correct if the 700N man was statically loaded (i.e. wasn't dropped or falling). But since he is dropped from some height that person with the stiffness you calculated would overshoot and crash into the ground because he has inertia. It takes more force to stop something moving than to hold something up if that makes sense.
 
I see. In this case would it be correct to say that force should not be used, because even though the forces cancel out each other, there is a residual velocity that continues downwards and crash the person into the ground?
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K