Use of Special or General Relativity in QM?

hagopbul
Messages
397
Reaction score
45
why no one use the Special or General Relativity in QM (Quantum mechanics) ...

when QM studies particles that move in the speed of light (or near it)

in the same time the Special or General Relativity only be visible (its effect ) in such speeds

do not thing that QM perturbation is using Relativity theories
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hagopbul said:
why no one use the Special or General Relativity in QM (Quantum mechanics) ...
Really? How about the Dirac equation?
 
no it is not maybe in some way they use "some" of it but
you can not say that he use the Relativity theories
because ther is nothing about the mass change in it
 
hagopbul said:
no it is not maybe in some way they use "some" of it but
you can not say that he use the Relativity theories
because ther is nothing about the mass change in it
Increasing mass is a fallacy, there is no such thing as "relativistic mass". However, Dirac's formulation is entirely consistent with the relativistic four-vector and can be applied to curved space-time. What more do you want?
 
Last edited:
OK i will reread about it do you know any book that is specialized in Dirac's theories only.
 
I can recommend a text, but it is rather expensive: Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (Pure & Applied Physics) J.D. Bjorken, S.D. Drell. I'd recommend getting it from the library if you can.
 
hagopbul said:
why no one use the Special or General Relativity in QM (Quantum mechanics) ...

when QM studies particles that move in the speed of light (or near it)

in the same time the Special or General Relativity only be visible (its effect ) in such speeds

do not thing that QM perturbation is using Relativity theories

Look up quantum field theory. It is a fully relativistic invariant formulation of quantum mechanics. It marries special relativity and quantum mechanics. As for general relativity, that's a whole different can of worms.
 
thanks we will talk later
 
Back
Top