USEMENT PARK PHYSICS: Will a Roller Coaster Stay on the Track?

JOJOKOY
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A roller coaster gets over the first hill of height 50.0 meters moving less than 1 meter per second. Then would it stay with the track if it were not mechanically held on to it at the top of the loop the loop. (The top of the loop the loop is 35 meters and it goes 17.1 meters per second at that height). Explain Why or Why Not?

I thought that it would stay with the track anyways because the net force is not great enough.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JOJOKOY said:
A roller coaster gets over the first hill of height 50.0 meters moving less than 1 meter per second. Then would it stay with the track if it were not mechanically held on to it at the top of the loop the loop. (The top of the loop the loop is 35 meters and it goes 17.1 meters per second at that height). Explain Why or Why Not?
I thought that it would stay with the track anyways because the net force is not great enough.
What do you mean? Not great enough for what? How did you work this out? You can't just guess.

You have to determine the speed of the roller coaster at the top of the loop. How do you do that? (think conservation of energy and assume no losses due to friction or air).

Think of the forces on the roller coaster at the top of the loop. Do a free body diagram showing all the forces. What is the acceleration of the roller coaster at the top if it just makes it around the loop on its own? What provides that acceleration?

AM
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top