User-defined orthonormal basis

markuz
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know how to create a orthonormal basis, i.e. a matrix containing orthogonal vectors of norm 1, out of a given direction (normalised vector or versor) in a space with dimension N>3?
With "out of a given direction", I mean that the resulting basis would have the first vector equal to the provided versor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In principle, all you need is to find N - 1 more linearly independent vectors, and then you can apply the Gram-Schmidt process. That preserves the first vector, so if you put your given vector first in the list it will remain unaltered.
 
thanks

Thanks it works! Not sure about the numerical stability but will keep an eye on it.
Thanks again
Cheers!
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top