Uses of very large magnetic fields

AI Thread Summary
Magnetars produce extreme magnetic fields around 10 gigatesla, which can lead to phenomena such as photon splitting. Hypothetically, a reproducible magnetic field of 100,000+ tesla could revolutionize research, enabling applications like diamagnetic levitation for human flight and safe astronaut landings on Mars. Current experimental magnets reach about 1000 tesla, while CERN's Large Hadron Collider operates at around 10 tesla, highlighting the potential for more efficient, powerful magnets in particle physics. However, fields exceeding 10^9 gauss are lethal, distorting atomic structures and making life impossible. The discussion underscores the fascinating yet dangerous implications of very large magnetic fields in both theoretical and practical contexts.
trini
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
Ok, so i was browsing around wiki and read about something called a magnetar, which is a very dense neutron star producing magnetic fields in the order of 10 gigatesla. According to the write up, photons split up readily into 2 or more photons. now i know the most powerful magnets we have available for experimental purposes is about 1000 T, my question is, hypothetically of course, what would be the potential uses of a powerful reproducable field in the order of 100,000+Tesla to modern research?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Who cares about research?! We could float haha... look up Diamagnetic Levitation :)
 
To make humans fly about 50 Tesla should be enough.
 
You could safely crash land astronauts on e.g. Mars (like we sent the Mars rovers or the Pathfinder) using magnetic fields. When the spacecraft hits the surface, they will be accelerated at perhaps 30 g. But if this force is transferred to the volume of the body in a more or less uniform way (uniform per unit mass), then no stresses will build up in the body. It is similar to being in free fall while accelerating at 30 g in a gravitational field.
 
maybe we could make cosmic rays:
http://cerncourier.com/cws/article/cern/28268

1000T sounds high..I though the LHC was around ten or so?
in any case, I bet CERN would love to be able to exchange their high energy and apparently fragile magnets for something more powerful and efficient...

splitting one photon into two photons seems spooky...
 
http://solomon.as.utexas.edu/~duncan/magnetar.html"

The strongest magnetic field that you are ever likely to encounter personally is about 10^4 Gauss if you have Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan for medical diagnosis. Such fields pose no threat to your health, hardly affecting the atoms in your body. Fields in excess of 10^9 Gauss, however, would be instantly lethal. Such fields strongly distort atoms, compressing atomic electron clouds into cigar shapes, with the long axis aligned with the field, thus rendering the chemistry of life impossible. A magnetar within 1000 kilometers would thus kill you via pure static magnetism -- if it didn't already get you with X-rays, gamma rays, high energy particles, extreme gravity, bursts and flares...
In fields much stronger than 10^9 Gauss, atoms are compressed into thin needles. At 10^14 Gauss, atomic needles have widths of about 1% of their length, hundreds of times thinner than unmagnetized atoms. Such atoms can form polymer-like molecular chains or fibers. A carpet of such magnetized fibers probably exist at the surface of a magnetar, at least in places where the surface is cool enough to form atoms.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top