Using Algebraic Manipulation to evaluate a limit

EcKoh
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



limx→3 (x2+5x+2) ÷ x2-6x+92. The attempt at a solution

You cannot solve through direct substitution because the denominator comes out to equal 0, and you cannot divide by 0. Thus, I factored the lower terms to reach the following:

(x-3)2 or (x-3)(x-3).

However, to my knowledge I cannot do this to the numerator, as ±1 & ±2 do not add up to 5 in any way, shape, or form. As such, I manipulated (x2+5x+2) into the following:

x(x+5)+2

But I am not sure where to go from here as the denominator still adds up to 0, and I am not sure of how to simplify any further. As of right now I have:

x(x+5)+2 ÷ (x-3)(x-3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try dividing the numerator and denominator by x^2 after dividing the polynomial.
 
EcKoh said:

Homework Statement



limx→3 (x2+5x+2) ÷ x2-6x+9


2. The attempt at a solution

You cannot solve through direct substitution because the denominator comes out to equal 0, and you cannot divide by 0. Thus, I factored the lower terms to reach the following:

(x-3)2 or (x-3)(x-3).

However, to my knowledge I cannot do this to the numerator, as ±1 & ±2 do not add up to 5 in any way, shape, or form. As such, I manipulated (x2+5x+2) into the following:

x(x+5)+2

But I am not sure where to go from here as the denominator still adds up to 0, and I am not sure of how to simplify any further. As of right now I have:

x(x+5)+2 ÷ (x-3)(x-3)
I assume you mean that you're trying to find limx→3 (x2+5x+2) ÷ (x2-6x+9). (The parentheses are important.)

Usually, one simply observes that as x→3, the numerator → 2 and the denominator → 0 (from the positive side) so that the limit is +∞ .
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top