Using Algebraic Manipulation to evaluate a limit

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit evaluation discussed is limx→3 (x2 + 5x + 2) ÷ (x2 - 6x + 9). Direct substitution leads to a denominator of zero, necessitating algebraic manipulation. The denominator factors to (x - 3)2, while the numerator is manipulated to x(x + 5) + 2. Ultimately, as x approaches 3, the limit approaches +∞ due to the numerator approaching 2 and the denominator approaching 0 from the positive side.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Ability to factor polynomials
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation techniques
  • Knowledge of the behavior of functions as they approach specific values
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of limits approaching infinity in calculus
  • Learn advanced polynomial factoring techniques
  • Explore the application of L'Hôpital's Rule for indeterminate forms
  • Investigate the implications of limits in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and polynomial functions, as well as educators seeking to clarify limit evaluation techniques.

EcKoh
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



limx→3 (x2+5x+2) ÷ x2-6x+92. The attempt at a solution

You cannot solve through direct substitution because the denominator comes out to equal 0, and you cannot divide by 0. Thus, I factored the lower terms to reach the following:

(x-3)2 or (x-3)(x-3).

However, to my knowledge I cannot do this to the numerator, as ±1 & ±2 do not add up to 5 in any way, shape, or form. As such, I manipulated (x2+5x+2) into the following:

x(x+5)+2

But I am not sure where to go from here as the denominator still adds up to 0, and I am not sure of how to simplify any further. As of right now I have:

x(x+5)+2 ÷ (x-3)(x-3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try dividing the numerator and denominator by x^2 after dividing the polynomial.
 
EcKoh said:

Homework Statement



limx→3 (x2+5x+2) ÷ x2-6x+9


2. The attempt at a solution

You cannot solve through direct substitution because the denominator comes out to equal 0, and you cannot divide by 0. Thus, I factored the lower terms to reach the following:

(x-3)2 or (x-3)(x-3).

However, to my knowledge I cannot do this to the numerator, as ±1 & ±2 do not add up to 5 in any way, shape, or form. As such, I manipulated (x2+5x+2) into the following:

x(x+5)+2

But I am not sure where to go from here as the denominator still adds up to 0, and I am not sure of how to simplify any further. As of right now I have:

x(x+5)+2 ÷ (x-3)(x-3)
I assume you mean that you're trying to find limx→3 (x2+5x+2) ÷ (x2-6x+9). (The parentheses are important.)

Usually, one simply observes that as x→3, the numerator → 2 and the denominator → 0 (from the positive side) so that the limit is +∞ .
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K