Using an accelerometer to measure speed

lucvh
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am interested in using an accelerometer to calculate the speed of a car. The accelerometer is a triaxial one and gives 3 values of acceleration; x y and z. These can be assumed to be accurate as i have already worked on the calibration of these values so that they come out in gs. Is there a way to calculate the acceleration of the device independent of its alignment to the motion of acceleration?
For example, the accelerometer would be mounted to the dashboard of the car, but as the car accelerates the rear axle of the car dips and therefore the angle of the vector has changed. This is fine to calculate, if it weren't for gravity. I can't understand how to remove the acceleration due to gravity when the exact alignment of the sensor is un known. Does anyone have any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need that angle. Try adding an angular rate sensor and integrating to find the angle. Then you can remove the acceleration due to gravity and integrate to find the velocity. http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/Data_Sheets/778386516ADXRS150_B.pdf They are about $50 on digikey. However, I know you can find them cheaper.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or you could find the angle by having a frictionless POT and using an ADC. I'm not sure a close enough to frictionless POT exists.
 
The idea was to only use the available hardware. Is there no way to do it knowing that the vector i need to resolve it into is at 90 degrees to the acceleration of gravity?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top