B Using battery energy to heat a battery…

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Devin-M
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Uber drivers using a Tesla Model 3 face a decision on battery preheating strategies to maximize profits in varying temperatures. Preheating the battery only when heading to the charging station may lead to slower charging rates if the battery isn't warm enough upon arrival. Alternatively, maintaining a constant optimal temperature throughout the day increases charging efficiency but consumes more energy. The analysis suggests that two short charging sessions with a pre-warmed battery can yield more energy and range than a single longer session. Ultimately, the optimal strategy balances energy costs against time saved to reach profit targets.
Devin-M
Messages
1,073
Reaction score
765
TL;DR
Thermodynamics of using a battery to heat itself…
Problem: You’re an Uber driver with a Tesla Model 3. Today’s low: 30F, high: 65F.
You want to reach a USD$ profit target in the least number of hours, but your choices could have added cost. Do you preheat the battery only when you are headed to the charging station (to increase the charging rate by warming the battery — however the battery might not be “warm enough” when your reach the charger and thus slower charging rates), or do you always “navigate to the charger” the entire day (which preheats the battery), so that the car maintains the battery at the optimal temperature for the entire day (thus always giving peak charge speed on arrival to the supercharger, but using more power). This option uses more energy to maintain battery at near constant temp, and the charging rate is increased so less time charging, downtime is reduced (more time available to earn). What is the optimal strategy for least time to a certain dollar profit target, considering charging costs $0.45USD/kwh?
 
Science news on Phys.org
IMG_2897.webp

PS… It isn’t necessary to fully charge the battery each time. As seen above, with the battery pre-warmed, two separate 15 minute charging sessions with driving in between provides more energy and range than a single 30 minute session.

*EDIT: When I initially viewed this chart I thought it showed pre-warmed vs not prewarmed, but I believe this chart only shows the battery with initial cell temp close to 40C, the solid line is the cell temps and the dashed line is the power into the pack. What isn’t shown by this graph is if the cells are in freezing temperatures, this initial charging power will be much lower.
 
Last edited:
I took some measurements today. The temp was constant 55f. A full preconditioning took 3.3kWh. Then after 2 hours of driving and 61 miles traveled, maintaining the constant preconditioning took a further 1.3kWh. In the pictures below, the preconditioning energy use is shown in miles. These miles can be multiplied by the rated 222Wh/mi to get the Wh used.

IMG_2900.webp

IMG_2902.webp

IMG_2909.webp

IMG_2911.webp
 
Measuring the temperatures of bright (visible spectrum) cosmic objects would use spectral analysis. But temperatures of IR (warm / hot) radiators is done using Stefan's Law with radiometric cameras. There seems no reason why suitable filters couldn't be used to find the black body temperature using the ratio of two measured intensities after the fashion of colour TV cameras. Why? Could it be to do with the actual size of IR filters to mount on a two channel image sensor array? I'm sure there...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 152 ·
4
Replies
152
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K