Using coefficients of static and kinetic friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a box of textbooks on a ramp, focusing on static and kinetic friction coefficients. The minimum angle for the box to start slipping was calculated using the static friction coefficient, resulting in an angle of approximately 19.29 degrees. Once the box begins to move, the net force was determined, leading to an acceleration of 1.109 m/s². After sliding a distance of 5.3 meters, the box's final speed was calculated to be about 3.4 m/s. The importance of using the correct friction coefficient for each phase of motion was emphasized, confirming the approach taken in the calculations.
Crusaderking1
Messages
158
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A box of textbooks of mass 24.6 kg rests on a loading ramp that makes an angle theta with the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.23 and the coefficient of static friction is 0.35.

A. As the angle theta is increased, find the minimum angle at which the box starts to slip.

B. At this angle, find the acceleration once the box has begun to move.

C. At this angle, how fast will the box be moving after it has slid a distance 5.3 m along the loading ramp?

Homework Equations



kinematics(for x-motion)

mgsinθ = ks*mgcosθ

F=mgsinθ-k*mgcosθ


The Attempt at a Solution




A. 24.6*9.80sinθ=0.35*24.6*9.80cosθ

241.08sinθ=84.378cosθ

tan^-1 = 19.29°

B. F=(24.6)(9.80)sinθ-0.23(24.6)(9.80)cosθ

F=241.08sinθ-55.4484cosθ

F=27.305 N

27.305/24.6 = 1.109 m/s^2

C. 5.3= .5(1.109)t^2

3.09 = t

then, 0+ (1.109)(3.09) = 3.4 m/s

I have no idea is this is right or not. I'm not sure if I should have used 0.23 or 0.35 for part A but I'm assuming static(0.35) because that is what it needs to "start" moving. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me, at first hand, that you've done everything accurately, though abit cumbersome in my view.
You were absolutely right to use the static friction coefficient as long as the box was still quasi-stationary(on the "brink") so to speak, but, once it got rolling, the application of Kinetic factors is essential.
Following the algebra is trivial and a trifle, and from my perspective, the physics is a-okay.
Good job!
Daniel
P.S
I might first help to etch out the formulae via signs and symbols, and plug in only at the end of the process; Saves unit hassles and possible sign/truncation errors.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top