Using Common properties of Solids in Life

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of solids based on their physical properties, specifically comparing non-polar molecular solids like wax and ionic solids like salt to network solids such as clay and sand. It highlights that wax and salt are weaker and more prone to melting or dissolving, which limits their practical applications in construction. The conversation also touches on the differences between soft and hard metals, questioning why certain metals are preferred for building despite the potential strength of others. The role of molecular structure in determining the toughness and properties of materials is emphasized, with examples illustrating how the arrangement of molecules affects their strength and usability. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of understanding molecular characteristics in material selection for practical applications.
Soley101
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hey, I just finished a lab on classifying solids based on their physical properties. I was just curious about some of the solids that I investigated. Wax (a non-polar molecular solid) and salt (ionic solid) were pretty weak -either melted or dissolved compared to network solids like clay and sand. Why is this? So do people never use these types of things to build or do anything practical with because tehy break, why do they break :S it baffles me. I suppose I didn't fully understand that concept. And also, I don't understand how you can have soft metals and hard metals. Why can't you build things with any kind of metal,I meant once you use enough of it, Can''t it be strong enough. Or do we just use some metals because they are cheaper or you need to use less. HOW can metals be strong :) My teacher draws really confusing diagrams with electrons and bonding, does anyone know what he might mean by these pictures?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I doubt you melted any salt...it has an extremely high melting point. *jabs herself with the finger of stupid knowiness)

The confusing pictures should demonstrate that how tough an item or element is, or it's properties, are based on it's molecular setup. Sorry to go back to the basics, but water has very loose molecules, almost no structure, but just enough to keep it together, gasses have little to no structure at all, and solids have a variety of molecules arranged in different ways.

http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/850/20227449.JPG

Salt structure-very firm and unbendylike

Wax is slick, a lipid if I'm not mistaken. It is easily broken due to it's characteristics, which are based on what molecules it's made of and how they are arranged.

We don't use these to build because...yea, they kinda break alot. Wax house? Uh-uh.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top