Using Coulombs Law-Comparative Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter wilson_chem90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Coulombs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electrostatic force using Coulomb's Law, specifically when both the distance between charges is doubled and one charge is tripled while the other is doubled. The original example provided a force of 6.0 x 10^-8 N, leading to a calculated F2 of 9.0 x 10^-8 N when combining the effects of the changes. However, participants clarify that the changes should be considered independently, resulting in F2 being F1/4 for the distance change and 6F1 for the charge changes. Ultimately, the correct interpretation leads to the conclusion that F2 is not simply a combination of the two effects but rather should be calculated separately for accuracy. The final consensus suggests that the initial calculation may have conflated the two scenarios.
wilson_chem90
Messages
137
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Look back at the Example in the Using Coulombs Law-Comparative Analysis section. Calculate the magnitude of F2 if both changes occurred simultaneously-that is, if the distance between the charges doubled and the size of once tripled, while the size of the other doubled.

This is the original example:

If the electrostatic force between two charges is 6.0 x 10^-8 N, what effect would each of the following changes have on the magnitude of the force?
1) the distance between the charges is doubled
2)One charge is doubled and the other is tripled

Solution:
1)
F2 = (6.0x10^-8 N)xr1 / (2r1)^2
= (6.0x10^-8 N) / 4
= 1.5 x 10^-8 N

2) q1=2q1
q2=3q1

F1/F2 = q1q2/q1q2

(6.0x10^-8 N)/F2 = q1q2 / (2q1)(3q2)

F2 = (6.0x10^-8N)(6)
= 3.6 x 10^-7 N

This is the solution to the example!


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


r' = 2r

q1' = 3q1

q2' = 2q2

First i set F1/F2 = (q1q2/r1^2) / ((3q1)(2q1)/2r1^2)

Then after i rearranged it and canceled out q1q2 and r1
i ended up with the equation F2 = 6F1/4

then i put in F1

therefore:

F2 = 6(6.0 x 10^-8N) / 4
= 9.0 x 10^-8 N

Therefore, the magnitude of F2 is 9.0 x 10^-8 N

I don't think i rearranged it correctly, can someone please confirm. Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wilson_chem90 said:
... i ended up with the equation F2 = 6F1/4...

It looks like you combined parts (1) and (2) together. The changes are made independently, so the answer to part (1) is F1/4 and the answer to part (2) is 6 F1.
 
kuruman said:
It looks like you combined parts (1) and (2) together. The changes are made independently, so the answer to part (1) is F1/4 and the answer to part (2) is 6 F1.

Would that mean that F2 is (3/2) of F1? if they were combined.

Because I obtained the same answer.
 
Why do you think that your answer is wrong?

It seems correct to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top