Using cramer's Rule to solve for x2, i'm confused on this example

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
I scanned the page out of the book, alittle bit is kinda burly but I'm confused on how they got A_2(B), where we are thinking of the system in matrix form AX = B. One verfies that detA = -127 and det[A_2(B)] = 313, so
x2 = det[A_2(B)]/det(A) = 313/-127 = -313/127;

How did they get B? and det[A_2(B)] here is the picture:
http://img416.imageshack.us/img416/9428/lastscan5eu.jpg
thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind i found the pattern, all they do is replace the 2nd column with the values after the =.
 
Correct, to find the 'n-th' unknown with Cramer's rule, you have to replace the n-th column by the column of the constants.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top