Using HELIOS Code for Preparing Macroscopic XS in PARCS

  • Thread starter Thread starter chivasorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Code Macroscopic
AI Thread Summary
HELIOS code is essential for preparing macroscopic cross sections for the PARCS code, and it is noted that many users rely on HELIOS despite limited discussion in forums. HELIOS was originally developed by Scandpower and is now under Studsvik, which also offers the CASMO lattice code. Users can obtain HELIOS from Studsvik, with specific terms for academic use. It is important to note that CASMO does not support hexagonal geometry. The discussion highlights the need for access to HELIOS for effective integration with PARCS.
chivasorn
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello all
Has anybody use HELIOS code yet? I need that in order to preparing macroscopic XS to PARCS.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Apparently plenty of people use Helios, but probably not too many post at PF.

As far as I remember, Helios was developed by Scandpower, but Studsvik bought (merged with) Scandpower in the mid 1990's. The preferred lattice code is Studsvik's CASMO, which can be linked to Studsvik's SIMULATE core simulator or AREVA's MICROBURN.
 
Last edited:
Hi Astronuc
Do you know how can I obtain HELIOS code? because I need that in order to link to PARCS.
 
chivasorn said:
Hi Astronuc
Do you know how can I obtain HELIOS code? because I need that in order to link to PARCS.
One can obtain HELIOS from Studsvik. I believe they have terms and conditions for academic use.
HELIOS Generalized Geometry Lattice Analysis
http://www.studsvik.com/index.php?p=ko&s=about_nuclear_fuel_analysis_software&t=helios&afw_lang=en
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you Astronuc!
 
bear in mind that Studsvik's CASMO cannot support hexagonal geometry
 

Thread 'MCNP6 BURN Card Issue: Zero Burnup for Material in Fuel Assembly'

Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information（power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.） for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
View full post »

Thread 'Beginner Seeking Help: MCNP6 Burnup Example (OECD-NEA Benchmark)'

Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
View full post »

Similar threads

How to apply Nemtab cross section library into PARCS?
Replies
0
Views
101
To use Genpmaxs for PARCS XS generation
Replies
1
Views
2K
Computation for nuclear reactor systems
Replies
1
Views
3K
Thermal-hydraulic codes for cores and thermal-hydraulic codes for systems
Replies
3
Views
5K
MCNP code for Neutron Spectroscopy
Replies
17
Views
3K
I need help please for Simulation of Xenon Oscillations in a Nuclear Reactor
Replies
4
Views
1K
What is the meaning of 'kappa' in Parcs cross-section input files?
Replies
1
Views
5K
Why is my SSW/SSR code not producing readable output from a KCODE run?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Can DRAGON/DONJON Code Handle Complex Boron Compositions in PWR Analysis?
Replies
8
Views
4K
Core Design: Questions on Codes Used
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top