Using Kepler's constant for Jupiter

  • Thread starter Thread starter emadtheman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Jupiter
AI Thread Summary
To calculate Kepler's constant for Jupiter, the discussion highlights the use of two formulas: k = r^3/T^2 and K = G(M+m)/4pi^2. The user initially struggles with the correct application of these formulas due to insufficient data and confusion over units. It is clarified that using the formula with G requires the period to be in seconds for accurate results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent units and suggests that calculations should be done in a way that aligns with the chosen formula for clarity. Overall, the thread focuses on resolving calculation discrepancies and understanding the proper use of Kepler's constant.
emadtheman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given that Jupiter has a mass of 1.9*10^27kg, and the sun has a mass of 1.99*10^30kg:

a)Calculate the value of Kepler's constant for Jupiter

Homework Equations



k = r^3/T^2
K = G(M+m)/4pi^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Well since the question only gave me the mass of Jupiter and the Sun I'm assuming that I should use Gm/4pi^2 instead even though this formula should only be used when the masses of the two objects (Jupiter and Sun) are close to each other...right?

Let G = Universal gravitational constant
Let M = mass of the Sun
Let m = mass of Jupiter

K = G(M+m)/4pi^2
k = (6.67*10^-11)(1.99*10^30 + 1.9*10^27)/4pi^2
=3.365*10^18, I'm not sure about the units for this formula

I'm pretty sure I can't use k = r^3/T^2 because the question didn't provide me with enough information to do so, but out of curiosity I googled the radius of Jupiter along with its period and plugged it in the formula:

radius (r) is in meters and period (T) is in days (should it be in days or years?)
k = r^3/T^2
= 71492000^3/4331.57^2
= 1.9475*10^16 m/d

If T was in years (11.89):
k = r^3/T^2
= 71492000^3/11.89^2
= 2.584*10^21 m/y

Ok, so clearly these numbers aren't close to the one above. Can you guys point out what I'm doing wrong?

also another confusion that I have, according to other sources(Wikipedia) Kepler's constant should be k = T^2/r^3 rather than(my textbook) k = r^3/T^2.

and if I use K = T^2/r^3 (for T is in days)
K = 5.134*10^-17 d/m

for T in years:
k = 3.868*10^-22 y/m

Please help me out on this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your dimensions need fixing. The dimensions of K (or k) are [Length]3/[Time]2. If you choose the formula that has G in it, it is less confusing to do all calculations expressing the period in seconds, then convert to m3/yr2 for K if you wish. That's because G has "seconds" buried in it as its units are N.m2/kg2 and N = kg.m/s2.
 
Thanks for the reply.
according to what you said, in this case, would it be better to use the formula with G in it?

also, Should the calculation be done in years or days?
 
Either way should give you the same number. However, if you use the formula with G, the period must be expressed in seconds.
 
ok, I'll try that.
thanks a bunch for the help. I'll come back to this topic again next week as I'm going on a short trip.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top