Using Kinematics to find the Distance of an object dropped from rest

  • Thread starter Thread starter garcia1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Rest
AI Thread Summary
To find the height h from which the stone is dropped, the time for the stone thrown upwards must first be calculated. The initial speed of the thrown stone is 44.1 m/s, and it will take time to reach its peak and then fall back down. Using kinematic equations, the total time can be determined, which is then applied to find the distance h for the dropped stone under gravitational acceleration of 9.8 m/s². Previous attempts to solve for h using incorrect assumptions about the motion of both stones led to erroneous results. The correct approach involves calculating the time of flight for the thrown stone and using that to find the distance fallen by the dropped stone.
garcia1
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A stone is thrown straight up from the ground
with an initial speed of 44.1 m/s . At the same
instant, a stone is dropped from a height of
h meters above ground level. The two stones
strike the ground simultaneously.
Find the height h. The acceleration of
gravity is 9.8 m/s2 .
Answer in units of m.


Homework Equations



Kinematics equations, such as V^2 = Vo^2 + 2ax, V = Vo +at, x = Vot +1/2at^2, and x = 1/2(Vo +V)t


The Attempt at a Solution



I first thought that by plugging the known variables, with V as 0 m/s, into V^2 = Vo^2 +2ax, solving for x. I got x=99.225. This was wrong. I then re-read the statement, thinking that I needed to double my answer, since the object thrown up also had a downward portion before it hit the ground with the falling object. This was x = 198.45m. This was also wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you need to find the time it takes for the rock thrown upwards to hit the floor again. Using that time, you know that the second rock covered a distance of h in the same amount of time under uniform acceleration.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top