Using Regulator ICs In Parallel to Increase Output Current?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swuster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using regulator ICs in parallel to increase output current, specifically focusing on the L4902A regulator. Participants explore the implications of current sharing, stability, and potential alternatives for achieving higher current output.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the logic of paralleling regulator ICs to increase output current, noting the L4902A's maximum output of 300 mA.
  • Another participant highlights that regulators are pull-up devices, suggesting that if one regulator has a slightly higher setpoint, it may source most of the current, potentially leading to issues.
  • Concerns are raised about the current limiting mechanism of the L4902A, with one participant suggesting that its current limiting is not robust enough for parallel operation.
  • There is a proposal to use separate current regulator diodes to manage current sharing, although concerns are expressed about the potential for the regulator with the higher setpoint to damage the diode.
  • One participant suggests using a transistor or Darlington pair in conjunction with the regulator to handle the load instead of paralleling multiple regulators.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and safety of paralleling regulator ICs, with no consensus reached on the best approach to increase output current.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need to address current limit/sharing aspects and stability issues when paralleling power supplies, indicating that the internal circuit design of the L4902A may not be suitable for this application.

swuster
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Can I use regulator ICs in parallel in order to increase the output current? I don't see any logical problem with it, though I may be missing something. Thinking of using L4902A but its output is maxed at 300 mA. Can I just string a few of them in parallel (adequately heatsinked, of course) to push my current up a little higher?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
swuster said:
Can I use regulator ICs in parallel in order to increase the output current? I don't see any logical problem with it, though I may be missing something. Thinking of using L4902A but its output is maxed at 300 mA. Can I just string a few of them in parallel (adequately heatsinked, of course) to push my current up a little higher?

The main issue is that regulators are pull-up devices only. So whichever one has a slightly higher setpoint within tolerances will try to source all of the current. As long as they all have a simple current limit mechanism (as opposed to fold-back current limiting, which many linear regulators have), then yes, they could be directly paralleled.

To parallel power supplies, you generally need to do something, either to address the current limit/sharing aspect, or to address stability issues (usually in switching power supplies). What is the internal circuit like on the L4902?
 
Actually, looking at the block diagram, the current limiting is not very robust at all - I may just end up using another chip altogether. It's essentially just two linear regulators and a timing circuit; the only reason I chose this particular one was for the added convenience of having the two outputs. In either case, could I just route it through separate current regulator diodes? I feel like the regulator with the higher setpoint would still try to source the current and burn out the diode or something.
 
Why not just use a transistor/darlington with the regulator to handle the load?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K