Using Rspec to Interpret Stellar Spectra

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Raxas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spectra Stellar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using Rspec software to interpret stellar spectra from photographs taken by a high school student. The focus is on the challenges faced in calibrating and analyzing the spectral data, along with suggestions for improving the quality of the images captured.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster expresses difficulty in using Rspec due to a perceived lack of knowledge and seeks guidance on interpreting their calibrated image.
  • Some participants inquire about the specific targets of the photographs to better understand the context of the analysis.
  • Suggestions are made to use longer exposure times and to ensure that the telescope is on a tracking mount to improve image quality.
  • One participant recommends modifying the input data using image editing software to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Another participant suggests adjusting the distance between the grating and the CCD chip to spread out the spectrum, along with the use of an IR filter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that improving the quality of the images is essential, but there are multiple suggestions on how to achieve this, indicating that no single approach has been established as the best solution.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the original poster's experience with Rspec and the specifics of their setup, which may affect the applicability of the suggestions provided.

Raxas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, PF.
I'm a simple high school student who likes a challenge, and as such, I decided to put together a research project involving reading spectral lines from photographs I took. I got the lens, I got the camera, I got pictures, and now I'm stumped. Reading up on Rpsec, a lot of it's users heralded it as "one of the easiest programs to use" for this kind of stuff. Much to my disappointment, it appears the people who said that probably had a more extensive knowledge of the subject than I did when they used it.
http://filesmelt.com/dl/calibratedimage.png
I've calibrated the image (at least I think I did, if I did something wrong, for the love of all that is good tell me), and I don't know where to go from here.

If I'm too far over my head and this is a dead end, just tell me and spare the sympathy, I'd rather not waste time with a dead-end project. If it can be done, I implore you to reveal the secret.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What are you taking pictures of?
 
try using longer exposures if you can. Is your scope on a tracking mount? You appear to have all that Rspec can give you but the noise is on the same scale as the absorptions you intend to see. You might also try to modify your input data by "stretching" in a program like Photoshop. Play with the contrast, saturation and brightness controls to get as much signal/noise as you can.
 
Drakkith said:
What are you taking pictures of?

Yes, what star are you looking at? You might start by taking a pic of the blue sky through a pinhole or slit and work that up to familarize yourself with Rspec as well.

edit. based on the filename of HD11506 I'm guessing that he is trying to duplicate the spectral identification of HD11506b by doppler spectrometry.
 
You might try to mount your grating a little farther from the CCD chip. Mounting it farther away spreads out the spectrum and dims the image a bit. If you do that, you will need to increase your integration time (or decrease your frames/sec if you are using a webcam). Don't forget to use an IR filter for your camera along with your grating (grism?) if the grating itself isn't a good enough IR filter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K