Using Simple Harmonic motion and conservation of motion to find maximum velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying concepts of simple harmonic motion and conservation of energy to determine the maximum velocity of an oscillating system. Participants reference relevant equations related to kinetic and potential energy, as well as the period of oscillation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use conservation of energy at the equilibrium point, questioning whether averaging two x values yields the correct equilibrium position. Other participants discuss the relationship between potential energy at different points in the motion and its implications for maximum velocity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the nature of oscillatory motion, while others have shared their calculations and findings. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of understanding the underlying principles, but no explicit consensus on the approach has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding assumptions about equilibrium and energy conservation, particularly in the context of the problem setup. There is mention of an upcoming exam, indicating a time constraint that may influence the discussion.

Fromaginator
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The Question
20091129232356339505875545475009354.gif


Relevant equations
KE=0.5*m*v^2
T=2*pi*sqrt(m/k)
EE=0.5*k*x^2
KEi+UEi=KEf+UEf
I think that's all of them

attempt at a solution
I was thinking about just using the conservation of energy at the the equilibrium point, as the kinetic energy would be at a max there and the potential energy would be at its minimum, Also the velocity would be at its max while the acceleration would be zero. However, one of the many problems I've run into on this question is that I'm unsure if the average of the two x values will give me the equilibrium point (if it did then it would be 5mm) and I don't feel comfrontable moving on having possibly made a false assumption.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got the answer :) but for others what I did was
from the graph u can see that potential at highest point is 5J and at lowest point is 1J

mgh+ 1/2mU^2 = mgH + 1/2 mV^2 in this U = initial velocity = 0 and V = max velocity at lowest point and mgh is initial potential energy and mgH is potential energy at lowest point.
this gives
5 + 0 = 1 + (1/2 x (1.7/1000) x V^2) [ 1.7 is divided by 1000 to convert grams into kg]
V^2 = 4705.88
V = sqrt(4705.88)
V = 68.59 m/s
 
Remember one thing- All the oscillations have two things in common
I. the oscillation takes place about an equilibrium position and,
II. the motion is periodic.

These are the only two conditions that are to be fulfilled for a motion to be oscillatory motion.
 
Thanks I'll keep that in mind in similar problems, my finals coming up soon it may come in handy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
996
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K