Using the FTC to take a derivative

  • Thread starter Thread starter dumbQuestion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
dumbQuestion
Messages
124
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Simplify the following:

d/dx[∫(t/lnt)dt] where the integral is a definite integral with bounds from x to x2

Homework Equations



The Fundamental THeorem of calculus says:

Suppose f is continuous on [a,b]

Then ∫abf(x)dx=F(b)-F(a) where F is any antiderivative of f

The Attempt at a Solution



So this is how I thought to solve it. Let f(t)=t/lnt

First notice that f(t) continuous on (1,c] forall c in ℝ => f(t) integrable and there exists an antiderivative F(t) such that F'(t) = f(t)So let F(t) be such an antiderivative. ***By the fundamental theorem of calculus,

∫f(t)dt (where the integral bounds are from x to x2=F(x2)-F(x)

This means

d/dx[∫f(t)dt] (where the integral bounds are from x to x2=d/dx[F(x2)-F(x)] = d/dx[F(x2)] - d/dx(F(x)] = 2xF'(x2) - F'(x) [by the Chain Rule] = 2x(x2/ln(x2)) - x/lnx = 2x3/2lnx - x/lnx [by rules of logarithm] = (x3-x)/lnx (common denominator and added them together)So I get that as long as the bounds on the integral are from (0,c), the answer to
d/dx[∫(t/lnt)dt] where the integral is a definite integral with bounds from x to x2 = (x3-x)/lnxOK here is my problem, the book solves this almost exactly the same way, but they never make any mention of the bounds on the integral or continuity. I guess I am confused. Do I not need to think about where the function is continuous? It's just part of the FTC says "Suppose f is continuous on [a,b]" so it seems to me like I can only apply it when that part holds. Why don't you need to think of continuity in this case? There is no restriction in the problem statement about x. How do you solve this problem for any general x? Also the other problem, is the line where I put ***. I think I've done something wrong here because this function is only continuous on the open region (1,c] for all c, but the FTC requires f be continuous on a closed bounded region [a,b]. So do I just pick a number great than 1, say [1.1,c]? I mean what's the formal way to solve this with regards to the continuity aspect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your problem implicitly assumes ##t>0## hence ##x>0## and ##x^2>0## because ##t>0## is the domain of ##\ln(t)##. So there is no problem.
 
But doesn't f need to be continuous on a closed bounded interval [a,b]? ln(t) is only continuous on (0,c] for all c in R.Can you apply the FTC if f is only continuous on an interval (a,b]?
 
dumbQuestion said:
But doesn't f need to be continuous on a closed bounded interval [a,b]? ln(t) is only continuous on (0,c] for all c in R.


Can you apply the FTC if f is only continuous on an interval (a,b]?

Likely not; I'd have to check. But it doesn't matter for this question. If ##x## and ##x^2## are both positive, then all your conditions are true on the closed interval between them so you can use the FTC.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top