Using ventura setup to induce oxygen into water.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robin07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxygen Water
AI Thread Summary
A venturi setup is proposed to introduce oxygen into a pond by creating a vacuum that draws air into the water line before it cascades into the pond. The user has observed that spreading the water flow improves clarity, suggesting a correlation between oxygenation and reduced algae growth. They are considering puncturing the in-fill line to install an inverted funnel for air intake but are unsure if a one-way valve is necessary. Starting with a small hole is suggested as a cautious approach. The discussion confirms the effectiveness of a venturi vacuum for this purpose.
Robin07
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
I would like to use a ventura type of setup to induce/atomize oxygen into water.

I have a pond that gets clearer as I spread out the same amount of water falling into the pond. The more I spread the falling water out causing multiple areas that crash down on the rock or the surface water, the clearer the water get over time. I've reached a point that I'm not able to spread the water out anymore, without sacrificing esthetics.

I would surmise that the more oxygenated the water is the less algea in the pond. So, I propose to puncher a hole in my in-fill line that feeds the circulated water from the resiour, mounting an inverted funnel, so no dirt gets in, that would suck air into the line before it gets to the falls. Will I need a one way valve or will the waters flow suck in more air than water escaping? I could start with a small hole I suppose. Short of doing so, what do you think?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks, that confirmed my hesitation.

Thanks again
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top