UV-Vis of zinc oxide nanoparticles

  • Thread starter Thread starter goggles31
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zinc
AI Thread Summary
Zinc oxide nanoparticles were prepared by reacting zinc sulfate with sodium hydroxide and urea, followed by centrifugation and washing. UV-Vis spectroscopy results show an unusual absorbance pattern, with a "v" shape observed between 400-700nm, which raises questions about the expected absorption peak around 350-390nm. Discussions suggest that the observed absorbance may be due to scattering rather than true absorption, especially if the particles are not adequately dissolved. Additionally, the presence of a sharp peak in the expected range is speculated to be related to excitonic behavior in the nanoparticles. Overall, the results indicate potential issues with particle size and dispersion affecting the UV-Vis analysis.
goggles31
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I prepared zinc oxide nanoparticles by reacting zinc sulfate with sodium hydroxide and urea. Then, I centrifuged the reaction mixture to obtain the white powder and washed it with deionized water several times. I then mixed the powder with deionized water for UV-Vis. My results are a bit weird and I need help understanding it. I performed UV-Vis for wavelengths between 200-800nm. Starting at 800nm, the absorbance is 0.045 and increases slowly to 0.0483 at 600nm. Then, it slowly decreases to 0.033 at 382nm. Here, it increases rapidly forming a "v" shape until 375nm and the spectrum continues until 200nm. I have a few questions:

  1. Why does ZnO show absorbance in the visible spectrum from 400-700nm? I made sure that my prepared solution was transparent before testing.
  2. ZnO should have an absorption peak around 350-390nm. Apparently mine is a "v" shaped trough. How did this occur?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Are you sure you're looking at absorbance and not transmittance? That would cause peaks to look like troughs.
 
TeethWhitener said:
Are you sure you're looking at absorbance and not transmittance? That would cause peaks to look like troughs.
Yes, I am sure. I have another sample in which I varied the concentration of precursor. It produces a peak.
 
I expect your particles are scattering the wavelengths, you're not looking at absorption or transmission in the visible. Have you done PSD analysis on your sample? A particle size of 2λ will scatter a wavelength of λ.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
PS: For good UV-Vis spectroscopy, the analyte must be dissolved in solution. Slurries do not give good results.
 
goggles31 said:
I prepared zinc oxide nanoparticles by reacting zinc sulfate with sodium hydroxide and urea. Then, I centrifuged the reaction mixture to obtain the white powder and washed it with deionized water several times. I then mixed the powder with deionized water for UV-Vis. My results are a bit weird and I need help understanding it. I performed UV-Vis for wavelengths between 200-800nm. Starting at 800nm, the absorbance is 0.045 and increases slowly to 0.0483 at 600nm. Then, it slowly decreases to 0.033 at 382nm. Here, it increases rapidly forming a "v" shape until 375nm and the spectrum continues until 200nm. I have a few questions:

  1. Why does ZnO show absorbance in the visible spectrum from 400-700nm? I made sure that my prepared solution was transparent before testing.
  2. ZnO should have an absorption peak around 350-390nm. Apparently mine is a "v" shaped trough. How did this occur?
1. has already been mentioned by Kebin McHugh as scattering, and I agree to this.

I am really not sure about 2. since my field of research is not semiconductor materials, but quick research gave me information that ZnO nanoparticles are supposed to have a sharp peak around that range. I speculate that it is an excitonic band.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top