V(center) of charged metal sphere inside a grounded shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential at the center of a charged metal sphere surrounded by a grounded shell. The potential is determined using the concept of equipotentiality and the Uniqueness theorem, leading to the conclusion that the total potential at the center is the difference between the potentials from the charged sphere and the image charge. Grounding the shell shifts the reference point for potential calculations, simplifying the approach to using Gauss's Law. The analysis indicates that as the radius of the grounded shell approaches that of the charged sphere, the induced charge cancels the sphere's charge, confirming option (d) as the correct answer. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing reference points in potential calculations.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-28_0-56-4.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Potential at the center of conducting charged sphere surrounded by a grounded shell

If I take another sphere of charge –q of radius a with uniform charge density, then the potential on the spherical region from the radius a to b is same to that of the original question.

According to Uniqueness theorem, the V at the center of the sphere due to the above system should be equal to that of the original question.

Since the conducting sphere is an equipotential, the potential due to this sphere at center is same to that of the surface = ## \frac { q}{4 \pi \epsilon _0 R} ## .The potential due to the image sphere of charge –q at the center is ## \frac { -q}{4 \pi \epsilon _0 a} ## .

So, the total potential at the center is ## \frac { q}{4 \pi \epsilon _0 R} ## - ## \frac { q}{4 \pi \epsilon _0 a} ## , option (d).
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-28_0-56-4.png
    upload_2017-12-28_0-56-4.png
    17.3 KB · Views: 3,540
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK, but you don't need to invoke the Uniqueness Theorem and image charges. Note that grounding the sphere effectively brings the reference point from infinity to ##r=a##. Then just use Gauss's Law to find the E-field in the region ##R < r < a## and then use ##V(R)-V(a)=-\int_a^R{E~dr}##.
 
kuruman said:
Note that grounding the sphere effectively brings the reference point from infinity to r=a.
I didn't note this.
I was in the habit of taking reference point at infinity, so I thought of solving it that way even when an easier approach was near.

Thanks for pointing it out.
 
Pushoam said:
didn't note this.
If you are prepared to trust the list of options then, noting that, you can get to the answer very quickly. It means that the radius b cannot be relevant, so we rule out options a and c.
As radius a tends to R, the induced charge cancels the charge on the inner sphere. This leaves d as the only option.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top