Valles Marineras Origin and Origin of Asteroid Belt Linked?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the origin of Valles Marineris on Mars, with one theory suggesting it was formed by a low-angle impact from an asteroid or comet, creating a large tear in the lithosphere. However, experts argue that large impacts typically result in circular craters rather than elongated features like Valles Marineris, which is more likely the result of tectonic activity due to Mars' geological history. The planet's smaller size and rapid cooling have led to significant tectonic features, and while impacts may influence tectonic shifts, they do not create canyons. Observations of surrounding geological formations, such as craters and material flow, are considered circumstantial rather than definitive evidence of impact-related origins. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards tectonic processes as the primary cause of Valles Marineris.
elroyjetsn
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
The aerial view of Valles Marineras has a strangely familiar look to it. As a kid I would shoot BB's at all sort of fruit and mud and stuff. Sometimes I'd hit a rotten apple or tomatoe with a glancing shot that would rip open a gaping tear for a distance as the BB would enter, force material out of the fruit thru the tear and afterword the tear would fill with soft material and juice(if the tear is facing up). I suspect that a similar event has occurred on Mars at some time in the past resulting in a trauma zone that is now called, "Valles Marineris".

Of course this would be a "punch-through" of a much greater scale. An asteroid or comet striking the planet at a low angle of insidence that is large and dense enough may have penetrated the lithosphere and blasted through the softer interior opening a huge tear in the lithosphere sending a 'rooster tail' of ejecta all around and into open space. The impact object would have no doubt been reduced to a much smaller size by the time it exited the lithoshpere again that is if it was able to do so at all.

Has such a theory ever been suggested?

Wayne
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
elroyjetsn said:
The aerial view of Valles Marineras has a strangely familiar look to it. As a kid I would shoot BB's at all sort of fruit and mud and stuff. Sometimes I'd hit a rotten apple or tomatoe with a glancing shot that would rip open a gaping tear for a distance as the BB would enter, force material out of the fruit thru the tear and afterword the tear would fill with soft material and juice(if the tear is facing up). I suspect that a similar event has occurred on Mars at some time in the past resulting in a trauma zone that is now called, "Valles Marineris".

Of course this would be a "punch-through" of a much greater scale. An asteroid or comet striking the planet at a low angle of insidence that is large and dense enough may have penetrated the lithosphere and blasted through the softer interior opening a huge tear in the lithosphere sending a 'rooster tail' of ejecta all around and into open space. The impact object would have no doubt been reduced to a much smaller size by the time it exited the lithoshpere again that is if it was able to do so at all.

Has such a theory ever been suggested?

Wayne
Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that for larger collisions. Basically, when collisions get big enough, they tend to make large, nearly-circular craters no matter the impact angle. More likely Valles Marineris was the result of tectonic activity in Mars' past. Mars, being smaller, has cooled faster than the Earth, and has less weathering. As a result it tends to have much larger tectonic features.
 
Chalnoth said:
Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that for larger collisions. Basically, when collisions get big enough, they tend to make large, nearly-circular craters no matter the impact angle. More likely Valles Marineris was the result of tectonic activity in Mars' past. Mars, being smaller, has cooled faster than the Earth, and has less weathering. As a result it tends to have much larger tectonic features.

On the West end of the valley there's a pretty large crater that somewhat offset from the "tear". But, I'm thinking an event of that magnitude might have taken an hour or so to play out and the planet's rotation would have distorted the trajectory. The region designated, "Noctis Labarynthus" being a possible entry point. The East end(Eos Chaos region) of the valley there appears to be a enormous amount of material flowing in all direction and further West there a large belt of impact craters, consistent with such an event. I suppose that may be circumstantial?

I speak as an amateur biologist with an interest in physics. LOL.
 
elroyjetsn said:
On the West end of the valley there's a pretty large crater that somewhat offset from the "tear". But, I'm thinking an event of that magnitude might have taken an hour or so to play out and the planet's rotation would have distorted the trajectory. The region designated, "Noctis Labarynthus" being a possible entry point. The East end(Eos Chaos region) of the valley there appears to be a enormous amount of material flowing in all direction and further West there a large belt of impact craters, consistent with such an event. I suppose that may be circumstantial?

I speak as an amateur biologist with an interest in physics. LOL.
Yeah, I suspect it's largely a coincidence. Such geological features generally occur because of the drifting of the planet's crust, which is driven by the currents in the mantle below the crust. An impact on the surface isn't going to have much of an effect on those underlying currents.

Now, such an energetic event may potentially have an impact on when a tectonic shift occurs, but it doesn't really change the underlying causes of the shifts, so I don't think it can be responsible for a feature like a canyon, especially as such features are built up from a large number of tectonic shifts produced over a large span of time.
 
We are speculating on the same thing a bit about the "crater chains" on Phobos, Vesta, and some other asteroids.

We have come to the conclusion they are formed by ring fragments, with the orbit decaying slowly enough to allow individual rocks to come in and bounce along the surface , then ejecting or slowing enough to finally plow into the surface.
There does seem to be a few of the chains that tail off at a parabola like a stone skipping.

Mars has such a low density atmosphere, it is not totally outside the realm of possibility. One of the reasons it is so hard to land there.
 
Hypervelocity said:
We are speculating on the same thing a bit about the "crater chains" on Phobos, Vesta, and some other asteroids.

We have come to the conclusion they are formed by ring fragments, with the orbit decaying slowly enough to allow individual rocks to come in and bounce along the surface , then ejecting or slowing enough to finally plow into the surface.
There does seem to be a few of the chains that tail off at a parabola like a stone skipping.

Mars has such a low density atmosphere, it is not totally outside the realm of possibility. One of the reasons it is so hard to land there.
Not for a feature that big, though.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top