Van del waals interaction in qm

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Del Interaction Qm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the approximation of van der Waals interactions in quantum mechanics as presented in the paper from DAMTP, Cambridge. The potential is expressed as V = e²/R + e²/(R+y) + e²/(R-x) + e²/(R+y-x) and approximated to V ≈ -2 e²/R³ xy under the condition R >> |x|, |y|. The user initially questioned the rationale behind this approximation and later recognized an error in their own Taylor series expansion regarding the signs of the terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with van der Waals forces
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansions
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of van der Waals interactions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the approximation V ≈ -2 e²/R³ xy
  • Learn about Taylor series and their applications in physics
  • Review potential energy equations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists studying intermolecular forces, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical modeling in physical sciences.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello

I read the follow paper about van del waals interaction in quantum mechanics

http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gold/pdfs/teaching/van_der_waals.pdf

In this paper the potential

[tex]V= e^2/R + e^2/(R+y)+e^2/(R-x)+ e^2/(R+y-x)[/tex]

is aproximated to [tex]V \approx -2 e^2/R^3 xy[/tex]

with R>>|x|,|y|

why this paper use this aproximation?

if i use Taylor series, my aproximation is

[tex]V=4 e^2 /R + 2 e^2/R (x-y) + 2 e^2 /R^3 (x^2+y^2) -2 e^2/R^3 xy[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ohh, sorry, my problem is with signus of V...delete my post please
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
578
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K