Vandenbosch, Huizenga. Nuclear Fission

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around locating the book "Nuclear Fission" by R. Vandenbosch and J.R. Huizenga, published in 1973. Participants suggest checking Amazon, but it appears to be unavailable there. A user finds it listed on Google Books and mentions availability at several UK bookstores, including Amazon.co.uk and Blackwells, with prices for used copies exceeding £100. Additionally, an ebook version is noted as being available at a more affordable price. The suggestion to check local libraries for access to the book is also made.
majid313mirzae
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
i want this book- can anyone help me?
Vandenbosch, R. and J. R. Huizenga. Nuclear Fission, Academic, New York, 1973.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
majid313mirzae said:
i want this book- can anyone help me?
Vandenbosch, R. and J. R. Huizenga. Nuclear Fission, Academic, New York, 1973.

Did you look on Amazon?
 
Hmm, I'm not finding it on Amazon.com -- maybe try contacting the publisher directly...?
 
Why not check a library, if you are near one?
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top