Vapor of a volatile substance in equilibrium with a fluid

AI Thread Summary
A research group in Gothenburg is planning a study on volatile anesthetics, specifically Sevoflurane and Isoflurane, focusing on calculating blood concentration from inhaled gas volume percentages. They are using ideal gas behavior principles, employing formulas for specific volume and density to derive concentration in mass/volume. The discussion highlights the importance of the distribution coefficient, which relates the concentration of anesthetic in blood to that in gas, and the equilibrium of partial pressures between the gas in the lungs and blood. Participants are exploring the implications of these calculations, noting that while partial pressures equilibrate, concentrations may differ, which the distribution coefficient addresses. They also reference existing studies on the behavior of these anesthetics and consider the relevance of partial pressures in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate modeling, acknowledging that results will represent an upper limit due to the simplicity of the model.
MGren
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey!

I'm in a research group in Gothenburg and we're planning a study with volatile anaesthetics. The problem is as follows:

In the clinical setting (operation room) this volatile anaesthetic is administred as a volume% of the inhaled gas. What we're going to do is take a part of this anaesthetic in it's liquid phase (a mass) and mix it with blood (volume).

So, what we need to do is to find a suitable way of calculating what blood concentration in mass/volume that an anaesthetic inhaled at X volume% causes.

I can tell you how we have reasoned:
Specific volume = (RT/PM) for an ideal gas, where R = Avogadro's constant, T = temperature, P = pressure och M = Molecular mass.

If I calculate it right, the unit is m^3/g

Density = 1/specific volume.

Densiteten is thus g/m^3 which is the same as a measure of the concentration of substance X in a solution containing only substance X.

If 2% of the inhaled volume of gas is composed of substance X, then the concentration of X X in that volume of gas would be 0,02 x the density of X.

The gas is the lungs (it is inhaled in the clinical setting) is at equilibrium with the gas in the blood (liquid) so that the partial pressure is the same in both.

The gases also have a property called distribution coefficient (D) which tells you the ratio (Concentration in blood) / Concentration in the gas.

So:

Volume% * Density of Substance X * Distribution coefficient, should equal a reasonable blood concentration in mass/volume.

What do you think?

The actual substances being used are: Sevoflurane and Isoflurane.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If you are going to assume ideal gas behavior, then the volume% will also be equal to molar%, yes? Can you calculate molar fraction from that? For an ideal gas, V=nRT/P. For partial pressure, the partial pressure of the fluranes will be equivalent to the total pressure times their molar fraction, yes?

What are your units for the distribution coefficient?
 
Hello chemisttree, thank you for your reply. I will examine your input and make some calculations.

The distribution coefficient I think is just a ratio of the concentration in blood/concentration in gas, so it wouldn't have a unit.

There has been some study done on the relation to ideal gas behaviour for these drugs and I think it did vary a bit with temperature, but it was about right.

I guess the second thing I need some help in understanding more fully is the behaviour of a gas in relation to a liquid. It makes somewhat sense that the partial pressures should be the same when they have equilibrized with one another, but it makes less sense that the concentrations would be the same... but maybe that's where the blood/gas distribution coefficient comes into play.
 
MGren said:
Hello chemisttree, thank you for your reply. I will examine your input and make some calculations.

The distribution coefficient I think is just a ratio of the concentration in blood/concentration in gas, so it wouldn't have a unit.

Sorry, I missed where you stated, "...distribution coefficient (D) which tells you the ratio (Concentration in blood) / Concentration in the gas."


There has been some study done on the relation to ideal gas behaviour for these drugs and I think it did vary a bit with temperature, but it was about right.

I guess the second thing I need some help in understanding more fully is the behaviour of a gas in relation to a liquid. It makes somewhat sense that the partial pressures should be the same when they have equilibrized with one another, but it makes less sense that the concentrations would be the same... but maybe that's where the blood/gas distribution coefficient comes into play.

Yes, definitely the coefficient handles all of that. Keep in mind that the results of your calculation will at best describe the upper limit of concentration for the two fluranes since such a simple model doesn't assume any elimination pathways.

Given that the distrubution coefficient is given, what value is knowing the partial pressures in the gas or the blood?

I would assume that the distribution coefficient could be used in the equality:

Molar fraction X in gas = distribution coefficient (concentration Xblood/concentration Xgas) * Molar fraction of X in blood

I would also assume the the molar mass of blood is roughly the same as 9% saline. That's just easier for me to visualize (rather than the specific volume, density terms).

Have you read the work of Lerou, J. G. C., et al in Anesthesiology, 75, 345-355 (1991), in Anesthesiology, 75, 230-237 (1991) and in Anesthesiology, 79, 932-942 (1993)?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top