Variable Dielectric Spherical Capacitor: Calculating Capacitance

sazerterus
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the capacitance of a spherical capacitor of inner radius A and outer radius B which is filled with a di-electric varying as e=c+dcos^2θ . c and d are constants and θ is the angle made with the z axis.(also known as the polar angle)

Homework Equations


$C=εA/d$

The Attempt at a Solution


At first,i thought maybe i should take the potential by keeping θ constant,and then taking the average of the potential to get avg V and then find the potential.Again,I realized that we could also consider the spheres to be thin parallel plates.But,both the process give different answer.Is either of them right?and if one is,can someone explain the process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that the polar angle dependence of the permittivity arises only in the displacement field not the electric field, hence the electric field has only radial dependence.
To find the capacity you need to find the potential difference between the two plates. For this use the integral form of Gauss's law (take care of the displacement field) to find the radial dependence of the electric field. From here finding the potential difference should be easy.
 
Thaakisfox said:
Use the fact that the polar angle dependence of the permittivity arises only in the displacement field not the electric field, hence the electric field has only radial dependence.
To find the capacity you need to find the potential difference between the two plates. For this use the integral form of Gauss's law (take care of the displacement field) to find the radial dependence of the electric field. From here finding the potential difference should be easy.

Could you please show how to start the calculations?Could you provide setup of any similar problem?Thanks for the help.
 
Suppose the charge on the inner sphere is Q. Now surround the sphere by an imaginary sphere S of radius r. By Gauss's law:

\oint_{S}\textbf{D}\;d\textbf{f}=Q

Where df is the element vector of the spherical surface. Consider a linear medium in this case the displacement field proportional to the first power of the electric field:

\textbf{D}(r,\theta)=\varepsilon(\theta)\textbf{E}(r)

(convince yourself the electric field only depends on r).

Now then we have:

E(r)r^2\oint_{S}\varepsilon(\theta)d\Omega=Q

Now just calculate the integral of the permitivity over the solid angle, and from here express the electric field.

When you have the electric field, integrate it between A and B to get the potential difference and from there the capacitance is self evident.
 
Thaakisfox said:
Suppose the charge on the inner sphere is Q. Now surround the sphere by an imaginary sphere S of radius r. By Gauss's law:

\oint_{S}\textbf{D}\;d\textbf{f}=Q

Where df is the element vector of the spherical surface. Consider a linear medium in this case the displacement field proportional to the first power of the electric field:

\textbf{D}(r,\theta)=\varepsilon(\theta)\textbf{E}(r)

(convince yourself the electric field only depends on r).

Now then we have:

E(r)r^2\oint_{S}\varepsilon(\theta)d\Omega=Q





Now just calculate the integral of the permitivity over the solid angle, and from here express the electric field.

When you have the electric field, integrate it between A and B to get the potential difference and from there the capacitance is self evident.

Finally I got it! Thnx a lot.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top