Variance of a summation of Gaussians

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeriousNoob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation Variance
SeriousNoob
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to follow a step in the textbook but I don't understand.

var\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}w[n]\right)\\<br /> =\frac{1}{N^2}\sum_{n=0}^{N-1}var(w[n])
where w[n] is a Gaussian random variable with mean = 0 and variance = 1

Homework Equations



Var(X) = \operatorname{E}\left[X^2 \right] - (\operatorname{E}[X])^2.<br />

The Attempt at a Solution


The mean is 0 because a summation of Gaussian is Gaussian.
But squaring the whole expression doesn't seem right as there seems to be a trick used to go from line 1 to 2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Two facts are being used here:

1. If X is a random variable and c is a constant, then \text{var}(cX) = c^2\text{var}(X).
2. If X and Y are uncorrelated random variables, then \text{var}(X + Y) = \text{var}(X) + \text{var}(Y). From this, it's an easy induction to handle the sum of N uncorrelated random variables.

Both of these facts are straightforward to prove and should be found in any probability book.
 
Thanks a lot. Haven't touched random variables for a while and the summation threw me off.

The proofs for those facts are indeed very straightforward.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top